-Quote from George Washington-

"When the government fears the people, we have liberty, but when the people fear the government, we have tyranny." - George Washington, American Revolutionary and first President of the USA

Sunday, October 31, 2010

save old growth

SAVE TRAPPER: Rally to Save Old Growth!

When: 12:00pm Thursday, November 4th

Where: Forest Service Building
333 SW 1st
SAVE TRAPPER: Rally to Save Old Growth!

When: 12:00pm Thursday, November 4th

Where: Forest Service Building
333 SW 1st

What is Trapper?

"Trapper" is 149 acres of threatened ancient and native forest in the Willamette National Forest. It is a timber sale that was auctioned off by the USDA Forest Service to Seneca Jones Timber Company. A clear cut at "Trapper" would pollute the McKenzie watershed, which provides drinking water for the city of Eugene, and would destroy some of the last Spotted Owl habitat in the region.

Join us in pressuring the Forest Service to buy back the sale and save it from logging!

For more info:

Cascadia Wildlands
 info@cascwild.org
cascwild.org

Save Trapper Campaign
 savetrapper10@gmail.com
savetrapper.blogspot.com

Portland Animal Defense League
 pdx_adl@riseup.net
pdxanimaldefenseleague.org

What gives us the right to destroy the natural environment?  Obviously, God created it, so we have no right to destroy God's creation.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

The FBI and hackers

Why does the FBI hack my computer?  Are they harassing me?

ppp0 bug in Ubuntu Meerkat

There appears to be a bug that slows down ppp0 in Maverick Meerkat.  It was in Lucid Lynx too.

Friday, October 29, 2010

To you Christians and Wiccans

I apologize for saying some of the things towards you here (like x-tian).  You really do not have to be so religious.  You can still have church, but please be kind to people of other religions.  Please do not be so pushy in other words.  This culture is okay and can accommodate you and all of us too.  I care about all religions.

You Wiccans can do more to help the less fortunate, so do so.  There must be some of you with extra money and/or good jobs to help out as Wiccans and Pagans.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Corporate violation of 1st amendment rights

Proof of Corporate violation of first amendment rights

How many times using Google do you get message, "sorry we can't find that.. check spelling"

But try Dogpile and you do........ for a limited time only
911 was done by the TAX EXEMPTORS
911 was done by the TAX EXEMPTORS
While reading www.libertyforlife.com and Clive's targeting by the forces that be, as was Michael Ruppert, and Christopher Boylan, two very good researchers of corruption and collusion of forces within the government, and WEBSITE developers...... I tried to follow a link Clive gave for restoring government to the people.

Using Google I got the "sorry" messade,
but using Dogpile I got this:



 link to www.coppercards.com

The Restore America Plan
The Restore America Plan is a bold achievable strategy for behind-the-scenes peaceful reconstruction of the de jure institutions of government without controversy, violence or civil war. After consultation with high ranking members of the United States armed forces, the Plan is in the process of assembling the Guardians of the Free Republics and reinhabiting the De jure Grand Juries to:

Restore and reinhabit the de jure institutions of lawful government.
Terminate illicit corporations posing as legitimate governments, in particular the territorial jurisdiction United States Federal Corporation (corp. ref. 28 U.S.C. 3002) posing as the de jure United States of America.
Terminate all presumed powers of attorney to such corporations.
End the foreclosure nightmare (for borrowing against one's own credit).
End tax prosecutions for resisting the transfer of private wealth to foreign banking cartels such as I.R.S. (former Puerto Rico Bureau of Taxation).
End street assaults against the sovereign People for failing to exhibit a State-issued confession of subject-class citizenship.
End all prosecutions which lack an injured party.
End admiralty prosecutions for kidnapping and other heinous crimes against mankind as "commercial crimes" against the corporate State under a contrived corporate color-of-law venue (corp. ref. 27 C.F.R. 72.11).
Terminate the intrusion of corporations posing as the state into every aspect of the People's lives.
End the use of covert contracts such as Form 1040, car registrations, birth certificate applications, and bank signature cards which confess the signer to be a legal fiction subject of the United States Federal Corporation ("U.S. person") that has waved his/her rights in favor of state-issued privileges.
End the use of deeds which classify the People as "tenants" on their own land, thereby transferring control to incorporated County registrars and tax assessors.
End the perversion of marriage into a commercial system of state-issued privileges through the so-called "marriage license" whereby incorporated "courts" presume the "right" to trespass on families and kidnap children.
End the hijacking of automobile ownership through DMV registrations which covertly exchange the divine rights of travel and ownership for the state-issued "privileges" of "driving" and "title."
In place of all of the above, substitute sovereign identification, diplomatic immunity and sovereign passports to facilitate safe passage throughout the world free from corporate State molestation and terror.
Restore the People's money and wealth from the banking institutions, war profiteers, and international loan sharks.
Instantly vest all mortgages, auto loans and personal business loans "issued" by members of the Fed. The state shall hold no paper on, or debts against, the sovereign People, directly or through its agencies and licensed banking institutions.
Instantly end all non-consensual and unlawful taxation including all taxes on the sacred rights of labor and privacy.
Empower and inspire the sovereign People to righteousness through such renewed abundance.
Issue orders to the military and police powers to enforce the Peoples' divine rights of birth.
Reabsorb all de facto actors into lawful de jure capacity.
End the perverse act of requiring the People to pray to "courts" as is now required under corporate rules and traditions.
Restore the de jure judicial institutions including the district court of the United States and the one supreme Court.
Quietly mirror the strategies of 1933 thereby using their (our) institutions, military and public officials to undo eighty years of subterfuge without provoking alarm, controversy or armed conflict.
Return the military and law enforcement institutions to proper and lawful de jure sovereign authority from the clutches of corporate actors.
Forgive all corporate actors who repent for their State-sponsored crimes against mankind. Remove the recidivists from office.
Do all of the above, and more, peacefully, discreetly, quietly and honorably, behind the scenes, without public proclamations or provocative actions against a general public that is mostly unaware of the hijacking of their free de jure American republics, and their hapless media.


MEDIA INQUIRIES ONLY EMAIL  media.therestoreamericaplan@hush.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it "

The Biggest TAX EXEMPT institution, so misnamed Federal Reserve, is your Feudal master, forcing you to pay at least five months of your labor to keep their wealth and families growing, while you can barely help your own.

It leads the Shadow government which perpetuates a murderous FBI and CIA.

Other Tax exempt institutions namely, the Jesuit led, Roman Catholic Church, with their immense wealth, and secret societies work hand in hand with them, as does the Zionist TAX EXEMPT arms of the Israeli Octopus. The Federal Reserve Corporation's primary founders, Rockefellers and Rothschilds have Immense TAX EXEMPT "philanthrophies" and United Nations and TAX EXEMPT World Bank.

TEA PARTIESTS blame the other party for the erosion of their security, BUT you must blame the TAX EXEMPTORS Who are running and ruining America.

Net Neutrality and why

First off, it is the First amendment right for an unfettered Internet.  Second, It keeps the prices down by competition in the market.  Third, the Telcos could rip off and gouge the federal, state and local governments including the military with the Internet prices.

Slant on Obama

A New Slant on Obama

A New Slant on Obama
I say that Obama is amazing, and is rebuilding the American dream! I will give you an entirely new slant on the "amazing" job Obama is doing, and I thank God for the President. Keep reading for my additional comments and an explanation.


When discussing Obama, I point to:



1. Obama destroyed the Clinton Political Machine, driving a stake through the heart of Hillary's presidential aspirations - something no Republican was ever able to do.



2. Obama killed off the Kennedy Dynasty - no more Kennedys trolling Washington looking for booze and women wanting rides home.



3. Obama is destroying the Democratic Party before our eyes! Dennis Moore had never lost a race. Evan Bayh had never lost a race. Byron Dorgan had never lost a race. Harry Reid - soon to be GONE! These are just a handful of the Democrats whose political careers Obama has destroyed. By the end of 2010, dozens more will be gone. Just think, in December of 2008 the Democrats were on the rise. In the last two election cycles, they had picked up 14 Senate seats and 52 House seats. The press was touting the death of the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party. However, in just one year, Obama put a stop to all of this and will probably give the House - if not the Senate - back to the Republicans.



4. Obama has completely exposed liberals and progressives for what they are. Sadly, every generation seems to need to re-learn the lesson on why they should never actually put liberals in charge. Obama is bringing home the lesson very well:



Liberals tax, borrow and spend.

Liberals won't bring themselves to protect America .

Liberals want to take over the economy.

Liberals think they know what is best for everyone.

Liberals are not happy until they are running YOUR life.



5. Obama has brought more Americans back to conservatism than anyone since Reagan. In one year, he has rejuvenated the Conservative Movement and brought out to the streets millions of freedom loving Americans. Name one other time when you saw your friends and neighbors this interested in taking back America !



6. Obama, with his "amazing leadership," has sparked the greatest period of sales of firearms and ammunition this country has seen. Law abiding citizens have rallied and have provided a "stimulus" to the sporting goods field while other industries have failed, faded, or moved off-shore.



7. In all honesty, one year ago I was more afraid than I have been in my life. Not afraid of the economy, but afraid of the direction our country was going. I thought, Americans have forgotten what this country is all about. My neighbors and friends, even strangers, have proved to me that my lack of confidence in the greatness and wisdom of the American people has been flat wrong.



8. When the American people wake up, no smooth talking teleprompter reader can fool them! Barack Obama has served to wake up these great Americans!



Again, I want to say: "Thank you, Barack Obama!" After all, this is exactly the kind of hope and change we desperately needed!!
Amy L. Dalton


 http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/150215/index.php

Why Obama Sold Out 27.Oct.2010 18:19

Not Rocket Science

Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh of The New Yorker points out that the Pentagon generals openly call Obama, "...the scared little black boy." Hersh points out that it likely the war economy interests and their generals have made Obama an offer he can't refuse. The offer extends to his family too. Would you do any differently? Curious too that on aniversary of Congressman Wellstone freedom of information documents show that Wellstone had a death threat the day before his plain "mysteriously" crashed.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Evil succeeds when...

Evil succeeds when good people say and do nothing.  The Holocaust is a prime example of this.  The good people of Germany said and did nothing as Hitler rose to power.  People are too complacent in their lives.  Quite contrary, the evil in the Southern U.S. did not succeed.  This was segregation and the Jim Crow laws that was the social evil of the day.  Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery Alabama bus to a white passenger, sparking a boycott of the bus system there.  People protested, both white and black, and endured the police dogs and water cannons.  Good always triumphs when the good people say NO to evil and do something about it.

Faith without works

In the Book of James, it says, "Faith without works is dead."  This is the worst of lukewarm Christianity.  It is okay to have abundance for a Christian, but if they do not help the stranger on the street panhandling or help someone in need, they are, in my opinion, lukewarm Christians.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

The rich and poor

The rich are kicking our asses
author: from Common Dreams
"One of every six workers, 26.8 million people, is unemployed or underemployed. This "real" unemployment rate is over 17%. There are 14.8 million people designated as "officially" unemployed by the government, a rate of 9.6 percent. Unemployment is worse for African American workers of whom 16.1 percent are unemployed."
Published on Monday, October 25, 2010 by CommonDreams.org
Socialism? The Rich Are Winning the US Class War: Facts Show Rich Getting Richer, Everyone Else Poorer

by Bill Quigley

The rich and their paid false prophets are doing a bang up job deceiving the poor and middle class. They have convinced many that an evil socialism is alive in the land and it is taking their fair share. But the deception cannot last - facts say otherwise.

Yes, there is a class war - the war of the rich on the poor and the middle class - and the rich are winning. That war has been going on for years. Look at the facts - facts the rich and their false paid prophets do not want people to know.

Let Glen Beck go on about socialists descending on Washington. Allow Rush Limbaugh to rail about "class warfare for a leftist agenda that will destroy our society." They are well compensated false prophets for the rich.

The truth is that for the several decades the rich in the US have been getting richer and the poor and middle class have been getting poorer. Look at the facts then make up your own mind.

Poor Getting Poorer: Facts

The official US poverty numbers show we now have the highest number of poor people in 51 years. The official US poverty rate is 14.3 percent or 43.6 million people in poverty. One in five children in the US is poor; one in ten senior citizens is poor. Source: US Census Bureau.

One of every six workers, 26.8 million people, is unemployed or underemployed. This "real" unemployment rate is over 17%. There are 14.8 million people designated as "officially" unemployed by the government, a rate of 9.6 percent. Unemployment is worse for African American workers of whom 16.1 percent are unemployed. Another 9.5 million people who are working only part-time while they are seeking full-time work but have had their hours cut back or are so far only able to find work part-time are not counted in the official unemployment numbers. Also, an additional 2.5 million are reported unemployed but not counted because they are classified as discouraged workers in part because they have been out of work for more than 12 months. Source: US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics October 2010 report.

The median household income for whites in the US is $51,861; for Asians it is $65,469; for African Americans it is $32,584; for Latinos it is $38,039. Source: US Census Bureau.

Fifty million people in the US lack health insurance. Source: US Census Bureau.

Women in the US have a greater lifetime risk of dying from pregnancy-related conditions than women in 40 other countries. African American US women are nearly 4 times more likely to die of pregnancy-related complications than white women. Source: Amnesty International Maternal Health Care Crisis in the USA.

About 3.5 million people, about one-third of which are children, are homeless at some point in the year in the US. Source: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.

Outside Atlanta, 33,000 people showed up to seek applications for low cost subsidized housing in August 2010. When Detroit offered emergency utility and housing assistance to help people facing evictions, more than 50,000 people showed up for the 3,000 vouchers. Source: News reports.

There are 49 million people in the US who live in households which eat only because they receive food stamps, visit food pantries or soup kitchens for help. Sixteen million are so poor they have skipped meals or foregone food at some point in the last year. This is the highest level since statistics have been kept. Source: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

Middle Class Going Backward: Facts

One or two generations ago it was possible for a middle class family to live on one income. Now it takes two incomes to try to enjoy the same quality of life. Wages have not kept up with inflation; adjusted for inflation they have lost ground over the past ten years. The cost of housing, education and health care have all increased at a much higher rate than wages and salaries. In 1967, the middle 60 percent of households received over 52% of all income. In 1998, it was down to 47%. The share going to the poor has also fallen, with the top 20% seeing their share rise. Mark Trumball, "Obama's challenge: reversing a decade of middle-class decline," Christian Science Monitor, January 25, 2010. link to www.csmonitor.com

A record 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure notice in 2009, higher than both 2008 and 2007. In 2010, the rate is expected to be rise to 3 million homes. Sources: Reuters and RealtyTrac.

Eleven million homeowners (about one in four homeowners) in the US are "under water" or owe more on their mortgages than their house is worth. Source: "Home truths," The Economist, October 23, 2010.

For the first time since the 1940s, the real incomes of middle-class families are lower at the end of the business cycle of the 2000s than they were at the beginning. Despite the fact that the American workforce is working harder and smarter than ever, they are sharing less and less in the benefits they are creating. This is true for white families but even truer for African American families whose gains in the 1990s have mostly been eliminated since then. Source: Jared Bernstein and Heidi Shierholz, State of Working America. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/swa08_00_execsum.pdf

Rich Getting Richer: Facts

The wealth of the richest 400 people in the US grew by 8% in the last year to $1.37 trillion. Source: Forbes 400: The super-rich get richer, September 22, 2010, Money.com

The top Hedge Fund Manager of 2009, David Tepper, "earned" $4 billion last year. The rest of the top ten earned: $3.3 billion, $2.5 billion, $2.3 billion, $1.4 billion, $1.3 billion (tie for 6th and 7th place), $900 million (tie for 8th and 9th place), and in last place out of the top ten, $825 million. Source: Business Insider. "Meet the top 10 earning hedge fund managers of 2009." http://www.businessinsider.com/meet-the-top-10-earning-hedge-fund-managers-of-2009-2010-4

Income disparity in the US is now as bad as it was right before the Great Depression at the end of the 1920s. From 1979 to 2006, the richest 1% more than doubled their share of the total US income, from 10% to 23%. The richest 1% have an average annual income of more than $1.3 million. For the last 25 years, over 90% of the total growth in income in the US went to the top 10% earners - leaving 9% of all income to be shared by the bottom 90%. Source: Jared Bernstein and Heidi Shierholz, State of Working America. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/tabfig/2008/01/19.pdf

In 1973, the average US CEO was paid $27 for every dollar paid to a typical worker; by 2007 that ratio had grown to $275 to $1. Source: Jared Bernstein and Heidi Shierholz, State of Working America. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/tabfig/2008/03/SWA08_Wages_Figure.3AE.pdf

Since 1992, the average tax rate on the richest 400 taxpayers in the US dropped from 26.8% to 16.62%. Source: US Internal Revenue Service. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07intop400.pdf

The US has the greatest inequality between rich and poor among all Western industrialized nations and it has been getting worse for 40 years. The World Factbook, published by the CIA, includes an international ranking of the inequality among families inside of each country, called the Gini Index. The US ranking of 45 in 2007 is the same as Argentina, Cameroon, and Cote d'Ivorie. The highest inequality can be found in countries like Namibia, South Africa, Haiti and Guatemala. The US ranking of 45 compares poorly to Japan (38), India (36), New Zealand, UK (34), Greece (33), Spain (32), Canada (32), France (32), South Korea (31), Netherlands (30), Ireland (30), Australia (30), Germany (27), Norway (25), and Sweden (23). Source: CIA The World Factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2172.html

Rich people live an average of about five years longer than poor people in the US. Naturally, gross inequality has consequences in terms of health, exposure to unhealthy working conditions, nutrition and lifestyle. In 1980, the most well off in the US had a life expectancy of 2.8 years over the least well-off. As the inequality gap widens, so does the life expectancy gap. In 1990, the gap was a little less than 4 years. In 2000, the least well-off could expect to live to age of 74.7 while the most well off had a life expectancy of 79.2 years. Source: Elise Gould, "Growing disparities in life expectancy," Economic Policy Institute. http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/webfeatures_snapshots_20080716/

Conclusion

These are extremely troubling facts for anyone concerned about economic fairness, equality of opportunity, and justice.

Thomas Jefferson once observed that the systematic restructuring of society to benefit the rich over the poor and middle class is a natural appetite of the rich. "Experience declares that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to... the general prey of the rich on the poor." But Jefferson also knew that justice can only be delayed so long when he said, "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever."

The rich talk about the rise of socialism to divert attention from the fact that they are devouring the basics of the poor and everyone else. Many of those crying socialism the loudest are doing it to enrich or empower themselves. They are right about one thing - there is a class war going on in the US. The rich are winning their class war, and it is time for everyone else to fight back for economic justice.
Bill is Legal Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and professor of law at Loyola University New Orleans. You can reach Bill at quigley77@gmail.com


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/10/25-0

Satanists and Wiccans

Satanists hate Wiccans.  They are very evil.  I am not joking.  They do very evil spells, involving ritual abuse of animals and children.  Anton LaVey was a well known satanist.  So was his daughter, Zeena Lavey.  She wrote a book called the ¨Satanic Witch¨.

Prisoners´ Rights

Prisoners and people in jail must be treated humanely.  They must be protected by all the rights given to all of us by the Constitution of the USA.  Also, all people must be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law

Misinterpreted verse in the Bible

This is from exodus.  Though the King James Bible says ¨Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live¨, the Hebrew Bible says ¨Thou shalt not suffer (allow) a poisoner to live.¨

Monday, October 25, 2010

About animal cruelty

One example is chickens used for food being put into tiny cages and being debeaked.  Another is beef cattle and milk cows getting factory farmed.

Protest fascism in all forms

That includes military adventurism, FBI harassment of activists, and the USA Patriot Act.  This also goes for the ilegality of marijuana.

None of us are dieties

This includes the OTO and other people of all religions.  This includes even me.  We are not even like them.  This includes me.  God, or the Lady and Lord as Wiccans know them are much wiser than us.  So are animals.  Us as humans are the younges species on this planet.  The rites of Wiccans should just be rememberances of times when we needed a priesthood and a common class.  This includes the sabbats.  Another thing is that magic must never be done under the influence of any drugs, including alcohol, and never on LSD like I did when I raised a cone of power after leading a spiral dance under the influence of that drug.  I don't even use acid anymore.  LSD, or acid as it is known as, is a very dangerous drug.

Technology and the Earth's health

The beneficial technologies have to start slowing down until it is frozen for 110 years, then it can slowly start back up again.  The bad technologies that harm birds senses and other life forms must go backwards and never be developed again.  This includes some satelites that do harm the senses of non-human creatures on this planet, and some humans too, particularly mentally ill people.  Voice to skull technology can stop a person that is very deranged, but should never be used to harass people.  Gasoline should be replaced with biodiesel, and Puron can replace freon for refrigerants and coolants.  Hemp oil added to biodiesel can make fuel very similar to gasoline, however.

The continent of Atlantis was very real, and I read once that it and a continent called Lemuria had a war with crystal earthquake producing weapons.  This technology must never ever be developed again.  I read this in a New Age book.

One drawback of the New Age movement in the 1980's was that crystals were strip mined in places like Arkansas.  Strip mining should never be done.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Please, protest nonviolently and peacefully

Would people like Dr. King, recpient of the Nobel Peace Price, condone violent protest?  Something to think about.

Ethnic Cleansing and the colored section

Ethnic Cleansing is wrong.  The church I belong to does not have a "whites only" section.  There are all kinds of races in our church.  There is no "white church" nor "black church" nor "Mexican church" nor "Oriental church", etc in the Kingdom of God.  Why does the KKK have to run for half the church, as the "highers-up" while the "black man" has to be the janitor or the Mexican woman has to clean the toliets?  Kind of stupid, huh?

Why are we in central America?

Why is it that our military is in Central America?  It is simple? Marijuana interdiction?  I have no idea why.  I read a post on Portland Indy Media about it.  That is why the marines invaded Costa Rica several months ago.  Marijuana should be legal and the US has no business being in Latin America anyway.  We would probably start another oil war in Venezuela?  That is a country in South America that is not involved in the cocaine trade.  Venezuela is also pretty much communist leaning in its politics?  I am not sure though.

Reki - Japanese art of healing

It is energy transfer involving laying on of hands.  One can work with other Reki masters to heal a patient or use it to heal him or herself.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

photos Obama Protest

Photos of Obama protest on 10-20

Photos of the hardy 50+ who bravely stood their ground against over 100 right-wing Tea Party or re-packaged Americans For Prosperity protestors and over 5,000 Obama supporters. Also photos of the right wingers to show how utterly confused and misled they are, in spite of their real anger/grievances. Sometimes, you don't know whether to laugh or weep! What will it take for ordinary Americans to wake up and stop being conned/manipulated by the elites and their pundits.
Well, there were over 5,000 Obama supporters, 100 right wing Tea Party/Americans for Prosperity, and 50 of us at the protest two days ago when Obama came to town to stump for Kitzhaber. But the progressive activists from Veterans for Peace, PCASC, SUPER, ISO, immigrant rights groups and others bravely stood their ground in spite of their small numbers, and did their best to get their message out. No more wars and occupations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and Pakistan, no more corporate giveaways and bailouts, Money for jobs and education, and no more voting for the two-party con men, Democrats and Republicans, soaking in corporate money and corruption. If we want real change, we've got to do it ourselves, not depend on politicians, leaders and cheerleaders. Look at what the French students and workers are doing right now to fight back against the cutbacks and attacks on them by the ruling elites. Strike, Blockade, Sabotage! Enough said!

Friday, October 22, 2010

Obama in PDX

OBAMA in PDX!

Obama rises to the occasion of a 5K+ strong audience, and encourages Oregonians to get involved in the latest electoral process. A strong showing of supporters (and Tea Party folks) are in attendance.
This is Martha Perez, reporting to you live from the Oregon Convention Center, where tonight thousands of guests are treated to a stunning who's who of political luminaries, including President-elect Barack Obama. The list of dignitaries include: Earl Blumenauer, David Wu, Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, Bill Bradbury, Lew Frederick, etc, along with a number of retired politicos, as well as a number of county, city, & state legislators, council members and candidates (Bob Stacey, Loretta Smith, etc). There is also a huge pro-union presence, with dozens of members from the various organizations (SEIU, AFL-CIO, Teamsters, Electricians, ICLU, etc) and affiliates.

Prior to the event, a sizable protest put on by Americans For Prosperity and/both Tea Party organizers were visible along NE MLK Blvd, marching northward on MLK, across the street from the Convention Center. There was also a respectable showing of Progressives & their supporters. There was something for everyone, irregardless of party affiliation. Vendors were hawking Obama merchandise, such as posters, t-shirts, buttons, stickers, and Obama Teddy Bears. Various organizations were also handing out flyers & leaflets in support of various ballot issues now coming to a vote (medical marijuana, voter owned elections, etc).

At one point, a participant fainted and had to be carried away from the proceedings, which temporarily disrupted the event. A protestor shouted loudly inside the premises and was escorted away by security. There was an entire section of audience devoted to John Kitzhaber (who also showed up). There was a strong security perimeter surrounding the event area (both inside & outside).

Reporting to you live from NE Portland, I'm Martha Perez, General Political Activist.

thanks for the report - but I wonder about solidarity with the peace activists? 21.Oct.2010 11:01

Joe Anybody iam@joe-anybody.com

I went to the event and 'proud' to report back, I didn't "buy in" to go in.

I can not believe how many people continue to support this Imperialist Leadership of the hope n change *mirage!

Yeah I listen to the speech on the radio when I was going home from the protest.
Hell-if "thats all I knew" (just hearing the lone speech) I would go inside and clap and scream too ...
(Just like an Elvis concert)

BUT.... I choose to stay outside and support the "Peace Movement" in "solidarity!"

While Outside:

I listen to the selfish "Tea Party folks"
I listened to the Christan(not) megaphone hate speech ranter(s).
I watched the cops stand around watching everyone.
I watched the corporate pundits all lined up with bright lights and satellite antennas and recording vans.
I watch the thousand "O" supports filter into the building like kids waiting for the circus.

I shook my head in wonderment!
It looked as if the people were 'just following" the next guy.
The sheep all seemed to just follow the person in front of them ...who followed the next person...who followed the next ...this blind follow the leader (figuratively speaking) is the well worn path to never make any change at all, exactly like what we are living and seeing as we speak today. (lost hope and no change)

But if you did go inside ....when Obama started repeating those old tired lies of Hope n Change" if you were inside you could (maybe) get goosebumps when he spoke and you "could stand and clap" ...for it does "sound" good. The problem is ...sounds good is NOT GOOD ENOUGH!

I see this whole charade as one giant big "hood wink" ...it actually breaks my heart and is pretty depressing.

Less than 50 people stood their ground for DEMANDING PEACE outside across from the MLK entrance.

Those are the activist that I stand in solidarity with.

Thats my hope for change, no mirage, no smoke and mirrors, no ticket needed, no line to stand in, just standing on the firm principles of peace and Justice.

A video from protests outside coming soon ((( i )))

http://www.joe-anybody.com

I choose Jesus

Originally, I got saved about 5 years ago.  I just rededicated my life to the Lord today.  I do pray for some Wiccan friends that I knew for their salvation.  The woman that got me saved told me that Jesus loves everyone.  Jesus is Lord.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

klamav does not work

it is a lemon - on the ubuntu OS

Who I am... Who I am not

All I know is that I am Martin, and my Wiccan circle name is Riverwind.  Though my looks kind of decieve you Christians much, though I resemble a man who walked the earth 2,000 years ago, I AM NOT JESUS CHRIST.  Nor am I a prophet.  All I am is a political activist (local Portland, Oregon politics, particularly talking about the police scandals here in town and national politics including the war in Afghanistan and the interventions in Latin America.

A little about what I like - I like all kinds of music, including Christian music, Wiccan/Pagan music, punk, grunge, heavy metal, and even some rap music.  I know how to build computers (desktops).

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

About Scott Cunningham's version of Wicca

In the beginning, there was the One.  The One created the Goddess and God.  In turn, the Goddess and God created the stars, galaxies and the planets.  This is the creation story that I follow.

Dear Mr. President...

Sorry for the harshness of that last post on my blog, but this is to shock you into reality.  This country is broke.  If marijuana was taxed, regulated and legal, it would help this country.  Congress has a responsibility too.  They need to pass either a law or a Constitutional ammendment legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana.  If they really care about this nation, they would do it.  Prohibition does not work.  That fact was proven with the 18th ammendment and all the business involving bootlegging.

Is President Obama Retarded? Or What?!?!

Why the bloody hell does marijuana have to be illegal?  I question authority.  I believe that the Goddess and God exist within me as well as in everyone.  I go by An it harm none, love, do as you will.  The President is either dumb as a dinosaur or simply put, damn hell crap retarded.  SEVERELY RETARDED!  Pot will heal this Earth peacefully.  Either that, or he is the biggest phony baloney that ever came down the pike!  He is full of BLARNEY!

Animal Farm

This current class system we have with the rich snob haves and the "lowly" poor have-nots has gotten out of hand.  The rich lord it over the poor like the aristocracies of old.  In this system in America, where our tax dollars are being flushed down a toilet of war and occupation (Afghanistan, Iraq, Latin America), it has gotten to the point, in George Orwell's words, "All animals are created equal, but some animals are created more equal.".  In Animal Farm, this was written on the side of the barn.

The Rainbow Family

I am a Rainbow Brother.  The Rainbow Family is all religions, races, and national origins.  Both sexes are EQUAL.  We love everyone.  We are human beings dedicated to healing the Earth.  There are Native American prophecies regarding the tribe of the Rainbow Warriors.  Even the Punk Rockers and kind heavy metalers are part of this family.  The Rainbow Family has its earliest roots in Jerry Garcia and the Grateful Dead, though it really started in whole in 1971 in Balboa Park, Van Nuys, CA.  The first national gathering was in 1978 at Mt. Shasta.  The current open source software as well as the Free Geek movement is also part of the Rainbow Family.

Male birth control

All a man needs to do to help control his ability to father a child is masturbate.  This lowers his sperm count. (It takes three to five days of sexual abstinance to get a woman pregnant).  This can lower the population significantly if people do this.  Anyway, masturbation is healthy behavior.

All Religions are valid

People are individuals.  That means whatever you believe in, as long as it teaches love towards others, your dieties, and yourself and does no harm is valid.  This is how I feel about it.  Many years ago, about 25 years ago, I used to hate Christians.  About five years ago, I became a Christian.  For about three years, I had a problem with Wiccans and preached against them on MySpace and prayed against a Wiccan-Pagan bookstore in a church prayer group.  It is true that the Goddess and God do discpline their own.  I have nothing against members of other religions now and feel all religions are valid, whether Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, Pagan (including Wicca and Asatru), Christian, etc.

Beyond Vietnam - Dr. King

Dear Mr Obama, Please read the Rev Martin Luther King Jr's speech Beyond Vietnam

Dear Mr Obama,

if Rev Martin Luther King Jr was alive today what would he think of your continuing policies of war criminals Bush and Cheney in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and even covert actions in Yemen? What would the great Rev King say to the class war you Mr Obama seem to ignore? And what would Rev King do about the corporate greed, use of mercenaries in unspoken wars and your continuing stand on a dual justice system? How would a modern Rev King approach Mr Obama's views about clean nuclear energy and green coal? And what would a modern Rev Martin Luther King Jr say to US imperial torture and refusal to take war criminals, Bush and Cheney, to the Hague for war crimes?

Mr Obama tear down this wall of injustice!
The Rev Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam speech


Beyond Vietnam
April 4, 1967. New York, N.Y.

Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I need not pause to say how very delighted I am to be here tonight, and how very delighted I am to see you expressing your concern about the issues that will be discussed tonight by turning out in such large numbers. I also want to say that I consider it a great honor to share this program with Dr. Bennett, Dr. Commager, and Rabbi Heschel, some of the distinguished leaders and personalities of our nation. And of course it's always good to come back to Riverside Church. Over the last eight years, I have had the privilege of preaching here almost every year in that period, and it is always a rich and rewarding experience to come to this great church and this great pulpit.

I come to this magnificent house of worship tonight because my conscience leaves me no other choice. I join you in this meeting because I am in deepest agreement with the aims and work of the organization which has brought us together, Clergy and Laymen Concerned About Vietnam. The recent statements of your executive committee are the sentiments of my own heart, and I found myself in full accord when I read its opening lines: "A time comes when silence is betrayal." That time has come for us in relation to Vietnam.

The truth of these words is beyond doubt, but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government's policy, especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one's own bosom and in the surrounding world. Moreover, when the issues at hand seem as perplexing as they often do in the case of this dreadful conflict, we are always on the verge of being mesmerized by uncertainty. But we must move on.

Some of us who have already begun to break the silence of the night have found that the calling to speak is often a vocation of agony, but we must speak. We must speak with all the humility that is appropriate to our limited vision, but we must speak. And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us. If it is, let us trace its movements, and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us.

Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: "Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King?" "Why are you joining the voices of dissent?" "Peace and civil rights don't mix," they say. "Aren't you hurting the cause of your people?" they ask. And when I hear them, though I often understand the source of their concern, I am nevertheless greatly saddened, for such questions mean that the inquirers have not really known me, my commitment, or my calling. Indeed, their questions suggest that they do not know the world in which they live. In the light of such tragic misunderstanding, I deem it of signal importance to try to state clearly, and I trust concisely, why I believe that the path from Dexter Avenue Baptist Church—the church in Montgomery, Alabama, where I began my pastorate—leads clearly to this sanctuary tonight.

I come to this platform tonight to make a passionate plea to my beloved nation. This speech is not addressed to Hanoi or to the National Liberation Front. It is not addressed to China or to Russia. Nor is it an attempt to overlook the ambiguity of the total situation and the need for a collective solution to the tragedy of Vietnam. Neither is it an attempt to make North Vietnam or the National Liberation Front paragons of virtue, nor to overlook the role they must play in the successful resolution of the problem. While they both may have justifiable reasons to be suspicious of the good faith of the United States, life and history give eloquent testimony to the fact that conflicts are never resolved without trustful give and take on both sides. Tonight, however, I wish not to speak with Hanoi and the National Liberation Front, but rather to my fellow Americans.

Since I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I and others have been waging in America. A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor, both black and white, through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. And I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.

Perhaps a more tragic recognition of reality took place when it became clear to me that the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home. It was sending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and to die in extraordinarily high proportions relative to the rest of the population. We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. So we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. So we watch them in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, but we realize that they would hardly live on the same block in Chicago. I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor.

My third reason moves to an even deeper level of awareness, for it grows out of my experience in the ghettos of the North over the last three years, especially the last three summers. As I have walked among the desperate, rejected, and angry young men, I have told them that Molotov cocktails and rifles would not solve their problems. I have tried to offer them my deepest compassion while maintaining my conviction that social change comes most meaningfully through nonviolent action. But they asked, and rightly so, "What about Vietnam?" They asked if our own nation wasn't using massive doses of violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted. Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my own government. For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.

For those who ask the question, "Aren't you a civil rights leader?" and thereby mean to exclude me from the movement for peace, I have this further answer. In 1957, when a group of us formed the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, we chose as our motto: "To save the soul of America." We were convinced that we could not limit our vision to certain rights for black people, but instead affirmed the conviction that America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. In a way we were agreeing with Langston Hughes, that black bard of Harlem, who had written earlier:

O, yes, I say it plain,

America never was America to me,

And yet I swear this oath—

America will be!

Now, it should be incandescently clear that no one who has any concern for the integrity and life of America today can ignore the present war. If America's soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read "Vietnam." It can never be saved so long as it destroys the deepest hopes of men the world over. So it is that those of us who are yet determined that "America will be" are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land.

As if the weight of such a commitment to the life and health of America were not enough, another burden of responsibility was placed upon me in 1964. And I cannot forget that the Nobel Peace Prize was also a commission, a commission to work harder than I had ever worked before for the brotherhood of man. This is a calling that takes me beyond national allegiances.

But even if it were not present, I would yet have to live with the meaning of my commitment to the ministry of Jesus Christ. To me, the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why I am speaking against the war. Could it be that they do not know that the Good News was meant for all men—for communist and capitalist, for their children and ours, for black and for white, for revolutionary and conservative? Have they forgotten that my ministry is in obedience to the one who loved His enemies so fully that He died for them? What then can I say to the Vietcong or to Castro or to Mao as a faithful minister of this one? Can I threaten them with death or must I not share with them my life?

Finally, as I try to explain for you and for myself the road that leads from Montgomery to this place, I would have offered all that was most valid if I simply said that I must be true to my conviction that I share with all men the calling to be a son of the living God. Beyond the calling of race or nation or creed is this vocation of sonship and brotherhood. Because I believe that the Father is deeply concerned especially for His suffering and helpless and outcast children, I come tonight to speak for them. This I believe to be the privilege and the burden of all of us who deem ourselves bound by allegiances and loyalties which are broader and deeper than nationalism and which go beyond our nation's self-defined goals and positions. We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for the victims of our nation, for those it calls "enemy," for no document from human hands can make these humans any less our brothers.

And as I ponder the madness of Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond in compassion, my mind goes constantly to the people of that peninsula. I speak now not of the soldiers of each side, not of the ideologies of the Liberation Front, not of the junta in Saigon, but simply of the people who have been living under the curse of war for almost three continuous decades now. I think of them, too, because it is clear to me that there will be no meaningful solution there until some attempt is made to know them and hear their broken cries.

They must see Americans as strange liberators. The Vietnamese people proclaimed their own independence in 1954, in 1945 rather, after a combined French and Japanese occupation and before the communist revolution in China. They were led by Ho Chi Minh. Even though they quoted the American Declaration of Independence in their own document of freedom, we refused to recognize them. Instead, we decided to support France in its reconquest of her former colony. Our government felt then that the Vietnamese people were not ready for independence, and we again fell victim to the deadly Western arrogance that has poisoned the international atmosphere for so long. With that tragic decision we rejected a revolutionary government seeking self-determination and a government that had been established not by China—for whom the Vietnamese have no great love—but by clearly indigenous forces that included some communists. For the peasants this new government meant real land reform, one of the most important needs in their lives.

For nine years following 1945 we denied the people of Vietnam the right of independence. For nine years we vigorously supported the French in their abortive effort to recolonize Vietnam. Before the end of the war we were meeting eighty percent of the French war costs. Even before the French were defeated at Dien Bien Phu, they began to despair of their reckless action, but we did not. We encouraged them with our huge financial and military supplies to continue the war even after they had lost the will. Soon we would be paying almost the full costs of this tragic attempt at recolonization.

After the French were defeated, it looked as if independence and land reform would come again through the Geneva Agreement. But instead there came the United States, determined that Ho should not unify the temporarily divided nation, and the peasants watched again as we supported one of the most vicious modern dictators, our chosen man, Premier Diem. The peasants watched and cringed as Diem ruthlessly rooted out all opposition, supported their extortionist landlords, and refused even to discuss reunification with the North. The peasants watched as all of this was presided over by United States influence and then by increasing numbers of United States troops who came to help quell the insurgency that Diem's methods had aroused. When Diem was overthrown they may have been happy, but the long line of military dictators seemed to offer no real change, especially in terms of their need for land and peace.

The only change came from America as we increased our troop commitments in support of governments which were singularly corrupt, inept, and without popular support. All the while the people read our leaflets and received the regular promises of peace and democracy and land reform. Now they languish under our bombs and consider us, not their fellow Vietnamese, the real enemy. They move sadly and apathetically as we herd them off the land of their fathers into concentration camps where minimal social needs are rarely met. They know they must move on or be destroyed by our bombs.

So they go, primarily women and children and the aged. They watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as the bulldozers roar through their areas preparing to destroy the precious trees. They wander into the hospitals with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one Vietcong-inflicted injury. So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children. They wander into the towns and see thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals. They see the children degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They see the children selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their mothers.

What do the peasants think as we ally ourselves with the landlords and as we refuse to put any action into our many words concerning land reform? What do they think as we test out our latest weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? Where are the roots of the independent Vietnam we claim to be building? Is it among these voiceless ones?

We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. We have cooperated in the crushing of the nation's only non-communist revolutionary political force, the unified Buddhist Church. We have supported the enemies of the peasants of Saigon. We have corrupted their women and children and killed their men.

Now there is little left to build on, save bitterness. Soon the only solid physical foundations remaining will be found at our military bases and in the concrete of the concentration camps we call "fortified hamlets." The peasants may well wonder if we plan to build our new Vietnam on such grounds as these. Could we blame them for such thoughts? We must speak for them and raise the questions they cannot raise. These, too, are our brothers.

Perhaps a more difficult but no less necessary task is to speak for those who have been designated as our enemies. What of the National Liberation Front, that strangely anonymous group we call "VC" or "communists"? What must they think of the United States of America when they realize that we permitted the repression and cruelty of Diem, which helped to bring them into being as a resistance group in the South? What do they think of our condoning the violence which led to their own taking up of arms? How can they believe in our integrity when now we speak of "aggression from the North" as if there were nothing more essential to the war? How can they trust us when now we charge them with violence after the murderous reign of Diem and charge them with violence while we pour every new weapon of death into their land? Surely we must understand their feelings, even if we do not condone their actions. Surely we must see that the men we supported pressed them to their violence. Surely we must see that our own computerized plans of destruction simply dwarf their greatest acts.

How do they judge us when our officials know that their membership is less than twenty-five percent communist, and yet insist on giving them the blanket name? What must they be thinking when they know that we are aware of their control of major sections of Vietnam, and yet we appear ready to allow national elections in which this highly organized political parallel government will not have a part? They ask how we can speak of free elections when the Saigon press is censored and controlled by the military junta. And they are surely right to wonder what kind of new government we plan to help form without them, the only party in real touch with the peasants. They question our political goals and they deny the reality of a peace settlement from which they will be excluded. Their questions are frighteningly relevant. Is our nation planning to build on political myth again, and then shore it up upon the power of a new violence?

Here is the true meaning and value of compassion and nonviolence, when it helps us to see the enemy's point of view, to hear his questions, to know his assessment of ourselves. For from his view we may indeed see the basic weaknesses of our own condition, and if we are mature, we may learn and grow and profit from the wisdom of the brothers who are called the opposition.

So, too, with Hanoi. In the North, where our bombs now pummel the land, and our mines endanger the waterways, we are met by a deep but understandable mistrust. To speak for them is to explain this lack of confidence in Western words, and especially their distrust of American intentions now. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. It was they who led a second struggle against French domination at tremendous costs, and then were persuaded to give up the land they controlled between the thirteenth and seventeenth parallel as a temporary measure at Geneva. After 1954, they watched us conspire with Diem to prevent elections which could have surely brought Ho Chi Minh to power over a united Vietnam, and they realized they had been betrayed again. When we ask why they do not leap to negotiate, these things must be remembered.

Also it must be clear that the leaders of Hanoi considered the presence of American troops in support of the Diem regime to have been the initial military breach of the Geneva Agreement concerning foreign troops, and they remind us that they did not begin to send troops in large numbers and even supplies into the South until American forces had moved into the tens of thousands.

Hanoi remembers how our leaders refused to tell us the truth about the earlier North Vietnamese overtures for peace, how the president claimed that none existed when they had clearly been made. Ho Chi Minh has watched as America has spoken of peace and built up its forces, and now he has surely heard the increasing international rumors of American plans for an invasion of the North. He knows the bombing and shelling and mining we are doing are part of traditional pre-invasion strategy. Perhaps only his sense of humor and of irony can save him when he hears the most powerful nation of the world speaking of aggression as it drops thousands of bombs on a poor, weak nation more than eight hundred, or rather, eight thousand miles away from its shores.

At this point I should make it clear that while I have tried in these last few minutes to give a voice to the voiceless in Vietnam and to understand the arguments of those who are called "enemy," I am as deeply concerned about our own troops there as anything else. For it occurs to me that what we are submitting them to in Vietnam is not simply the brutalizing process that goes on in any war where armies face each other and seek to destroy. We are adding cynicism to the process of death, for they must know after a short period there that none of the things we claim to be fighting for are really involved. Before long they must know that their government has sent them into a struggle among Vietnamese, and the more sophisticated surely realize that we are on the side of the wealthy, and the secure, while we create a hell for the poor.

Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home, and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as one who loves America, to the leaders of our own nation: The great initiative in this war is ours; the initiative to stop it must be ours.

This is the message of the great Buddhist leaders of Vietnam. Recently one of them wrote these words, and I quote:

Each day the war goes on the hatred increases in the hearts of the Vietnamese and in the hearts of those of humanitarian instinct. The Americans are forcing even their friends into becoming their enemies. It is curious that the Americans, who calculate so carefully on the possibilities of military victory, do not realize that in the process they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom, and democracy, but the image of violence and militarism.

If we continue, there will be no doubt in my mind and in the mind of the world that we have no honorable intentions in Vietnam. If we do not stop our war against the people of Vietnam immediately, the world will be left with no other alternative than to see this as some horrible, clumsy, and deadly game we have decided to play. The world now demands a maturity of America that we may not be able to achieve. It demands that we admit that we have been wrong from the beginning of our adventure in Vietnam, that we have been detrimental to the life of the Vietnamese people. The situation is one in which we must be ready to turn sharply from our present ways. In order to atone for our sins and errors in Vietnam, we should take the initiative in bringing a halt to this tragic war.

I would like to suggest five concrete things that our government should do immediately to begin the long and difficult process of extricating ourselves from this nightmarish conflict:

Number one: End all bombing in North and South Vietnam.

Number two: Declare a unilateral cease-fire in the hope that such action will create the atmosphere for negotiation.

Three: Take immediate steps to prevent other battlegrounds in Southeast Asia by curtailing our military buildup in Thailand and our interference in Laos.

Four: Realistically accept the fact that the National Liberation Front has substantial support in South Vietnam and must thereby play a role in any meaningful negotiations and any future Vietnam government.

Five: Set a date that we will remove all foreign troops from Vietnam in accordance with the 1954 Geneva Agreement. [Sustained applause]

Part of our ongoing commitment might well express itself in an offer to grant asylum to any Vietnamese who fears for his life under a new regime which included the Liberation Front. Then we must make what reparations we can for the damage we have done. We must provide the medical aid that is badly needed, making it available in this country if necessary. [Applause] Meanwhile, we in the churches and synagogues have a continuing task while we urge our government to disengage itself from a disgraceful commitment. We must continue to raise our voices and our lives if our nation persists in its perverse ways in Vietnam. We must be prepared to match actions with words by seeking out every creative method of protest possible.

As we counsel young men concerning military service we must clarify for them our nation's role in Vietnam and challenge them with the alternative of conscientious objection. [Sustained applause] I am pleased to say that this is a path now chosen by more than seventy students at my own alma mater, Morehouse College, and I recommend it to all who find the American course in Vietnam a dishonorable and unjust one. [Applause] Moreover, I would encourage all ministers of draft age to give up their ministerial exemptions and seek status as conscientious objectors. [Sustained applause] These are the times for real choices and not false ones. We are at the moment when our lives must be placed on the line if our nation is to survive its own folly. Every man of humane convictions must decide on the protest that best suits his convictions, but we must all protest.

Now there is something seductively tempting about stopping there and sending us all off on what in some circles has become a popular crusade against the war in Vietnam. I say we must enter that struggle, but I wish to go on now to say something even more disturbing.

The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit, and if we ignore this sobering reality, [Applause] and if we ignore this sobering reality, we will find ourselves organizing "clergy and laymen concerned" committees for the next generation. They will be concerned about Guatemala and Peru. They will be concerned about Thailand and Cambodia. They will be concerned about Mozambique and South Africa. We will be marching for these and a dozen other names and attending rallies without end unless there is a significant and profound change in American life and policy. [Sustained applause] So such thoughts take us beyond Vietnam, but not beyond our calling as sons of the living God.

In 1957, a sensitive American official overseas said that it seemed to him that our nation was on the wrong side of a world revolution. During the past ten years we have seen emerge a pattern of suppression which has now justified the presence of U.S. military advisors in Venezuela. This need to maintain social stability for our investment accounts for the counter-revolutionary action of American forces in Guatemala. It tells why American helicopters are being used against guerrillas in Cambodia and why American napalm and Green Beret forces have already been active against rebels in Peru.

It is with such activity in mind that the words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." [Sustained applause] Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken: the role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investments. I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin [applause], we must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. On the one hand we are called to play the Good Samaritan on life's roadside, but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho Road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life's highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. [Applause]

A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: "This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of South America and say: "This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just.

A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: "This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death. [Sustained applause]

America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing except a tragic death wish to prevent us from reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo with bruised hands until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood.

This kind of positive revolution of values is our best defense against communism. [Applause] War is not the answer. Communism will never be defeated by the use of atomic bombs or nuclear weapons. Let us not join those who shout war and, through their misguided passions, urge the United States to relinquish its participation in the United Nations. These are days which demand wise restraint and calm reasonableness. We must not engage in a negative anti-communism, but rather in a positive thrust for democracy, [Applause] realizing that our greatest defense against communism is to take offensive action in behalf of justice. We must with positive action seek to remove those conditions of poverty, insecurity, and injustice which are the fertile soil in which the seed of communism grows and develops.

These are revolutionary times. All over the globe men are revolting against old systems of exploitation and oppression, and out of the wounds of a frail world new systems of justice and equality are being born. The shirtless and barefoot people of the land are rising up as never before. The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light. We in the West must support these revolutions.

It is a sad fact that because of comfort, complacency, a morbid fear of communism, and our proneness to adjust to injustice, the Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch anti-revolutionaries. This has driven many to feel that only Marxism has a revolutionary spirit. Therefore, communism is a judgement against our failure to make democracy real and follow through on the revolutions that we initiated. Our only hope today lies in our ability to recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out into a sometimes hostile world declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism, and militarism. With this powerful commitment we shall boldly challenge the status quo and unjust mores, and thereby speed the day when "every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low; [Audience:] (Yes) the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain."

A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies.

This call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one's tribe, race, class and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all mankind. This oft misunderstood, this oft misinterpreted concept, so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force, has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of man. When I speak of love I am not speaking of some sentimental and weak response. I'm not speaking of that force which is just emotional bosh. I am speaking of that force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life. Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate reality. This Hindu-Moslem-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of Saint John: "Let us love one another, (Yes) for love is God. (Yes) And every one that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God, for God is love." "If we love one another, God dwelleth in us and his love is perfected in us." Let us hope that this spirit will become the order of the day.

We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation. The oceans of history are made turbulent by the ever-rising tides of hate. History is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of hate. As Arnold Toynbee says: "Love is the ultimate force that makes for the saving choice of life and good against the damning choice of death and evil. Therefore the first hope in our inventory must be the hope that love is going to have the last word."

We are now faced with the fact, my friends, that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history, there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked, and dejected with a lost opportunity. The tide in the affairs of men does not remain at flood—it ebbs. We may cry out desperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is adamant to every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residues of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words, "Too late." There is an invisible book of life that faithfully records our vigilance or our neglect. Omar Khayyam is right: "The moving finger writes, and having writ moves on."

We still have a choice today: nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation. We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world, a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act, we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark, and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.

Now let us begin. Now let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter, but beautiful, struggle for a new world. This is the calling of the sons of God, and our brothers wait eagerly for our response. Shall we say the odds are too great? Shall we tell them the struggle is too hard? Will our message be that the forces of American life militate against their arrival as full men, and we send our deepest regrets? Or will there be another message—of longing, of hope, of solidarity with their yearnings, of commitment to their cause, whatever the cost? The choice is ours, and though we might prefer it otherwise, we must choose in this crucial moment of human history.



 http://www.mlkonline.net/vietnam.html

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Nuclear war

Simply put, there are no winners in a thermonuclear war.  If the planet's atmosphere doesn't get half blown away into space, then we would fight the next world war with sticks and rocks.  Not only that, humanity would be doomed to live a bleak existence in burned out cities, frying in solar radiation.  No one can win a nuclear war.

Market Failure

Market Failure Wherever One Looks

7-8 million jobs lost in two years, 150,000 lost public sector jobs in September, are signs of total system incompetence. Three trillion wasted on wars of aggression/adventure. Three trillion given to Wall St. and banks by the incestuous state. It's time to redefine state and market and adopt alternative economic policy of reducing working hours and infrastructure funds
"The real market economy leads to problems. Prominent representatives of this economic system admit the market economy has no prescriptions to avoid or make up for its life-threatening damage..
The invisible hand, the organization of an economy as a markiet economy, burdens society with enormous costs. Belief in the market economy theory and holding to the real market economy is expensive for us."

MARKET FAILURE WHEREVER ONE LOOKS

By Conrad Schuhler

[This editorial from isw, institut für sozial-ökologische wirtschaftsforschung, July 2010 is translated from the German on the Internet,  http://www.isw-muenchen.de/forschungshefte40.html.]


"Climate change is the greatest case of market failure ever seen by the world" (Blatter 2006). The former chief economist of the World Bank (from 2000 to 2003) and advisor of the British government Nicholas Stern wrote this sentence in his widely-publicized study on the costs of climate protection and the expected climate catastrophe. "Ackermann said he no longer believed the markets alone can solve the financial market crisis. In light of the international turbulences, he doubts the self-healing powers of the market" (Tagesschau, 3/18/2008). Josef Ackermann outed here as a market skeptic is head of Deutsche Bank and of the IIF (The Institute of International Finance, the union of national bank associations and one of the most important managers at the center of the German economy.

What is special in these two quotations of the scholar and the capitalist is not simply the admission that the real market economy leads to problems. Prominent representatives of this economic system admit the market economy has no prescriptions to avoid or make up for its life-threatening damage. [1] ["It was a mistake to believe the market is always right. We must correct our view of the world." Nicolas Sarkozy, SZ, 1/28/2010]

These judgments were printed by hundreds of newspapers and journals. Given these events, one would think the followers of the market economy would be completely shocked to raise elementary questions or to speak out. But nothing like that happens. The two judgments are trivialized as very witty remarks. The followers are protagonists.

The market economy theoreticians developed the well-known idea of an "invisible hand" that orderly guides the conduct of individual market actors and the economy altogether to the best. This invisible hand as a figurative idea for the central elementary claim of the theory that the market mechanism guides the conduct of selfish individual market actors to an optimal and just economic result - without any special expense or coordination costs.

This view that the market and competition are superior to other economic systems is widespread in the population. On account of their school- and university education and the constant daily media exposure, many people have a vague idea that - somehow free and pure - markets can stabilize the economy, that they are efficient (achieve the best possible use of resources) and bring about an optimal distribution.

The basic theory about the stability, efficiency and optimality of a market economy is the so-called general equilibrium theory. This theory should be tested for its conclusiveness. To back its assertions, this theory depends on assumptions and presuppositions about economic relations and actors in the economy which are false - compared to reality. Thus the whole theory must be rejected as unsuitable for the analysis of the real market economy.

This theory is an ideology. A theory is more than a simple thought and the observation and ordering of particular facts. An economic theory must be able to make the logical connection of social and economic facts and events. A theory proposes a set of statements that are free of contradiction to one another and can explain the totality of observable facts: referring back to preceding causes and predicting and showing the consequences and conclusions for further events. This last capability of theory turns into instructions on goal-directed conduct. Theoretical findings are used to reach goals. This is a central feature of theories.

Theories can prove false, outmoded or incomplete. But false theories do not simply dissolve in thin air because they are false. They do not simply dissolve when they are permanently propagated at enormous expense and have an appearance of plausibility on first view. That the sun goes around the earth was a consensus for a thousand years. Hard struggles were needed to correct this.

False theories in areas where material interests play a great role (like economics and unlike pure mathematics) can continue existing as ideologies. By ideology, I understand a false opinion or theory that covers conditions of social rule (cf. Hofmann 1969). Thus ideologies are not mere errors but false statements with justification tendencies justifying existing conditions. This does not always mean supporters of an ideology are active conscious liars. Ideologies are not obviously ridiculous but can correctly explain isolated phenomenon torn out of the total context like the bankruptcy of a certain business after high increased wage- or raw material costs. Real market economies doubtlessly make usable products, growth and income so that the possible view that markets freed from all deficiencies are optimal in some way is not ridiculous from the start. To examine its ideological content, the theory must be tested on its ability to explain a real market economy before one asks about the interests that vigorously justify the maintenance and diffusion of such a theory.

The following questions must be raised and discussed regarding theory and ideology: How did this market theory arise? What are its basic ideas (chapter 2)? What makes this theory so attractive? What does it claim? How does the "invisible hand" guide everything to the best (chapter 3)? Where is the reasoning wrong? To what extent does the market theory treat what is not a real market economy (chapter 4)? This 4th chapter will claim most of the space. Why is such a failed theory maintained? How is it exploited for the ideological stabilization of the existing economic system (chapter 5)? Finally, can it be that this theory contributes nothing to explaining a market economy? Then we may not live in the best of all theoretically conceivable economic systems even if the real market economy is experientially the best of all possible economies. The invisible hand, the organization of an economy as a market economy, burdens society with enormous costs (chapter 6). Belief in the market economy theory and holding to the real market economy is expensive for us.

RELATED LINKS:

VIDEO: "21ST Century Enlightenment"
 http://www.wimp.com/centuryenlightenment/

Free Internet Book "Culture Change" by Alexis Zeigler
 http://conev.org/ren14x.pdf

www.grittv.org
www.informationclearinghouse.info
www.rdwolff.com
www.storyofstuff.com
www.submedia.tv
www.truth-out.org
homepage: homepage: http://www.freewebs.com/mbtranslations/
address: address: http://www.kboo.fm

Open Memo to Google Corp

Opem Memo To Google Corporation

Google must surrender to Congress , etc., any evidence in possession of Google relating to ongoing criminal assaults by the fbi/cia against Geral Sosbee.
MEMO TO: Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
Phone: +1 650-253-0000
Fax: +1 650-253-0001

This message is directed to the Executive Officers and Board of Google Corporation and is made public for reasons implied herein.

Over the past decade you and your technicians are privy to my documentations of fbi/cia threats, harassment, stalking, torture, attempted murder (and /or attempted forced suicide) and other criminal offenses against me. In many instances Google may have evidence to support my allegations against the fbi and the cia and such material in the possession of Google should be turned over to the appropriate branch of government for investigation. Some of the offenses against me have been summarized at
 http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/affidavit2007.html
 http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/geralsosbeearmyf.html
Additional examples of such evidence are apparent at :
 http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/mystory.html
 http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/hatemail-partele.html
 http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/noticetomedia.html

In other instances the fbi/cia have used the Google name and system to deliver to me threats of impending increased psychoelectronic assaults with confirmations after the fact of the delivery of such assaults. As of today I have fallen victim to several medical conditions and infirmities as a direct result of the fbi/cia high tech criminal assaults and all medical records are available to the appropriate authorities.

I ask Google to order the fbi and the cia to stop the exploitation of Google for the fbi/cia's unlawful and inhumane purposes; I also suggest that Google contact the FTC, the corrupt Congress and slovenly courts, and other appropriate authority of government in efforts to cause an investigation of the assassins of the fbi and the cia who continue (uninterrupted for a decade or more) their murderous agenda against me as I have extensively outlined at
 http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/

As of today Google fails to do what is right in this matter; accordingly, I will need to reassess my small investment in Google shares and to hereby notify the world (including the investment community) of Google's possible role in ( by deafening silence, etc.) some of the offenses that I record. For more information on the need to expose all who assist the fbi and the cia in their global and inhumane crime spree, see
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/11/382350.shtml?discuss

Finally, Google despite its original and best intentions 'to do no evil' appears at the very least on the verge of being embedded heart, mind and soul with the terrorists of the fbi and the cia. The vast resources of the Google Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates globally are now no doubt integrated into the fbi/cia global intelligence apparatus in such a way that Google Corporation itself can no longer stay above the fray which is an epic battle on behalf and for the preservation of Human & Civil Rights against gross & murderous ongoing government atrocities.

Thank you kindly.
geral sosbee
P.O. Box 3374
Harlingen, Texas
(956)536-3103
homepage: homepage: http://www.sosbeevfbi.com
phone: phone: (956)536-3103
address: address: po box 3374, harlingen,texas 78551