-Quote from George Washington-

"When the government fears the people, we have liberty, but when the people fear the government, we have tyranny." - George Washington, American Revolutionary and first President of the USA
Showing posts with label police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Obama's police state



Police State Justice Under Obama

police state
Police State Justice Under Obama - Stephen Lendman

Lawlessness, injustice, and contempt for democratic values define his administration. He delivered change all right - for the worst, and nothing ahead looks promising.

Obama-style "rules of engagement" include bullets, bombs, slit throats, knives in the back, or drone attacks justice.

Targeted victims are declared guilty by accusation. Due process and judicial fairness are discarded artifacts. US citizens are as vulnerable as global enemies.

No one is safe anywhere in a world ruled by rogue leaders, taking the law into their own hands with impunity.

As a result, freedom and security were jettisoned to memory hole oblivion. Let's count the ways.

Muslims are targeted for their faith, ethnicity, and at times prominence and charity.

Torture remains official US policy.

America's domestic and overseas gulags match the worst anywhere. Out of sight and mind, inmates are dehumanized and brutalized.

America's business is war and grand theft globally. Countries are raped and pillaged on the pretext of humanitarian intervention.

Everyone except corporate favorites and complicit elites suffer.

Ten Muslim Southern California students were convicted for exercising their First Amendment rights. Others are hunted down and prosecuted ruthlessly for political advantage.

Thousands of political prisoners suffer unjustly, including undocumented Latinos here because destructive trade pacts destroyed their livelihoods.

State-sponsored murder is official policy. Innocent victims include Troy Anthony Davis. Others wait their turn on death row. Federal, state and local authorities call it justice. Human rights activists call it crimes against humanity.

Murdering Anwar Al-Awlaki

CIA operatives and Special Forces death squads are authorized to kill US citizens abroad. For any reason or none at all without evidence, they're hunted down and murdered in cold blood.

Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was a US citizen living in Yemen, targeted for opposing US belligerency, not alleged or committed crimes.

His murder and others put Americans and everyone at risk globally if outspoken against imperial Washington lawlessness, including waging permanent global wars against humanity to profit handsomely from wreckage spoils.

After him, who's next? Maybe writers expressing outraged criticism. Maybe media hosts on air, and speakers justifiably denouncing rogue crimes.

Under Obama-style justice, they're potential targets, putting everyone at risk for speaking publicly against rampaging government criminality. Administration and congressional officials are recklessly out-of-control and unhinged, without morals or ethics. They fail to distinguish between right and wrong.

In September 2009, it was learned that then Central Command head (now CIA boss) General David Petraeus issued secret orders to covertly deploy US Special Operations forces to 75 or more Middle East, Central Asia, and Horn of Africa countries.

By implication, it meant anywhere in the world to "penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy" terror threats and "prepare the environment" for planned military attacks.

In other words, to make the world safe for Wall Street banks, war profiteers, and other Western capitalist predators.

Previous attempts to kill Al-Awaki failed, even though international human rights law permits lethal force in peacetime only when imminent deadly attack threats exist. Even then, killing is a last resort after other exhausting other measures.

Under international or US law, designating US citizens or anyone terrorists based on suspicions without proof is egregious by any standard. Moreover, no one should be denied due process and judicial fairness.

The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) condemned Al-Awlaki's killing, saying:

"The assassination of Anwar Al-Awlaki by American drone attacks is the latest of many affronts to domestic and international law, said Vince Warren," CCR Executive Director.

"The targeted assassination program that started under (Bush) and expanded under Obama essentially grants the executive" extralegal judge, jury, and executioner power.

"If we allow such gross overreaches of power to continue, we are setting the stage for increasing erosions of civil liberties and the rule of law."

Post-9/11, in fact, rule of law justice was trashed for political expediency. It no longer applies when unchallenged under presidential supremacy authority.

Obama elevated Bush era lawlessness to a higher level. As a result, no one anywhere targeted can hide or get justice.

Political Washington praised Al-Awlaki's murder. Falsely accusing him of crimes, Obama called it a "major blow" against Al Qaeda, vowing to target anyone America (without evidence) calls part of a global terrorist network.

US major media scoundrels approved, including a Washington Post editorial headlined, "Killing of Anwar al-Aulaqi was clearly justified," saying:

Doing so "was clearly justified, both legally and morally. (He) was dangerous, (and) Obama was right to place him on a target list. Considerable evidence supports the administration's contention that (he) played a direct role in attempted attacks on the United States, including the failed bombing of an airplane on Christmas day 2009..."

Fact check

Killing Al-Awlaki was morally indefensible extralegal murder. No evidence whatever connected him to crimes.  He had nothing to do with the alleged Amsterdam-Detroit bound Christmas day incident.

The alleged culprit, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian citizen, was set up. Denied a UK entrance visa, he avoided a no fly list. He paid cash for a one-way ticket, checked no luggage, had a US visa but no passport, and was helped on board by a well-dressed Indian gentleman, facilitating Washington's false flag plot. Abdulmutallab was used as a convenient dupe.

Moreover, his so-called (PETN) explosive was so weak and technically deficient it failed to go off properly, and its fire cracker strength assured no possibility of damaging the aircraft, let alone down it.

"Perhaps more significant, (Awlaki), a charismatic teacher and fluent English speaker was instrumental in inspiring would-be jihadists in the United States and other Western countries...."

Fact check

No evidence proves he inspired violence anywhere. Moreover, whether in or out of the country, America's Constitution protects First Amendment rights without which all others are at risk - including Washington Post editorial writers' freedom to wrongfully slander Al-Awlaki and call murder justified.

Calling him dangerous, however, "(h)e was consequently a legal and justified target of American forces, acting under the international principle of self-defense...."

Fact check

Unproved accusations have no legal validity. A serial aggressor, America never acts in self-defense. Moreover, individuals or groups defending themselves against US attacks are called "terrorists," including by major media op-ed and editorial writers, lying to support wealth and power.

On September 30, ACLU Deputy Legal Director Jameel Jaffer explained what media scoundrels won't say: namely that:

Targeted killing "violates both US and international law."

ACLU National Security Project Litigation Director Ben Wizner added:

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the President does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American (or anyone else) whom he concludes is an enemy of the state."

Doing so makes him a war criminal - an enemy of rule of law justice.

A Final Comment

Obama's lawlessness also embraces Military Commissions justice. It includes sweeping unconstitutional powers to detain, interrogate, and prosecute alleged suspects and collaborators (including US citizens), hold them (without evidence) indefinitely in military prisons, and deny them habeas and other constitutional protections.

The Military Commissions Act also authorized torture to extract confessions and other extralegal police state powers, including denying speedy trials or any at all.

In May 2009, Obama also authorized preventive detentions of anyone "who cannot be prosecuted yet who pose a clear danger to the American people," even with no evidence proving it.

Whether short, long-term or indefinite, preventive detentions violate core legal principles, including the Constitution's Fifth Amendment, stating:

"No person....shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...."

Indefinite detentions, military tribunals, targeted assassinations, and other extralegal policies are indefensible in democratic civil societies.

Under Obama, however, they're official policy.

As a result, out-of-control executive power threatens everyone, especially when cheerled by media scoundrels.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen (at) sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

videotaping of police beating

Woman charged after videotaping police beating the shit out of someone

Here we go again. This time the officer claims his 'privacy was violated'. A court here in Oregon ruled that Beaverton Police had no expectation of privacy when filmed in public.
 link to blog.alexanderhiggins.com

Criminal Charges Filed Against Woman For Filming And Exposing A Brutal Police Beating Cover Up That Left A Man Partially Blind And With Skull And Face Fractures

A Massachusetts police officer whose involvement in a brutal police beating was video taped has filed criminal charges against the women who video taped the incident and exposed the cover up. The officer is claiming the taping invaded his right to privacy and was a violation of state wiretapping laws.

During the incident Melvin Jones, whose picture is shown below, was left with a fractured skull, partial blindness in one eye, and fractured bones all over his face.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

FBI and police dress codes

I do not see any problem with the FBI and police officers that are plain-clothes, as well as secret service agents wearing cloaks in their work.  We as Wiccans sould have the right to come out of the broom-closet.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Homeless man beat to death by police

Cover Up Caught On Camera: 6 Police Officers Taser And Beat Homeless Man To Death

A shocking video has been released allegedly showing police officers tasering and beating a homeless man to death who they claim was resisting arrest.

Video footage of 6 Fullerton, CA police officers tasering and beating a homeless man to death exposes a cover up that local officials refuse to answer questions about.

Though the video is not clear, eye witnesses say the homeless man - Kelly Thomas, 37 - was unable to put up any resistance and was lying on the ground on his front when the attack took place on July 5.

His screams and cries for his father can be heard amid the tasering noises.
Corporate news coverage of the event downplays the prospect of police brutality or foul play in the incident.

ABC video report on the eyewitness statements and recently a released video of the beating captured by a bystander, both attached to this page below, contradict the official story of the incident given by the police.

The LA Times report on the incident, however, echoes the official police story failing to report within the article itself the claims from eyewitnesses.

As shown in the ABC video below, witnesses report that the man was not resisting arrest. They tell ABC he was actually knocked unconscious while the police continued to beat him and scream at him to stop resisting.

But in over three weeks since the incident little has been done as the apparent police cover up has continued.

Local residents report that public officials have stonewalled the public and media who are trying to get an official statement on the story.

The district attorney has so far remained silent on the issue. Bystanders who witnessed the deadly beating claim they have not been contacted by the city for their testimony about the incident.

One citizen reports he was finally able to corner the Mayor into making a statement to the public. In this this YouTube video of the Mayor stated, "You don't start talkin' about things if your trying to get the answer."  http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=w84LUUYWrsI


 link to blog.alexanderhiggins.com

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Portland police commissioner

From KATU

PORTLAND, Ore. – The Portland police sergeant embroiled in a "road rage" lawsuit will be moved to a desk job, says Portland City Commissioner Dan Saltzman.

The news comes three days after a driver involved in a roadway altercation with Sgt. Kyle Nice filed a lawsuit against Nice and the City of Portland.

Nice was off duty when he admits he "unholstered" his gun during that confrontation last Saturday. The driver involved, Neil Ruffin, told 9-1-1 dispatchers the gun was pointed right at him. Nice believed Ruffin nearly hit his personal truck, which held his 6-week-old baby, after Ruffin reportedly ran a red light on Southwest Allen Road.

Ruffin's lawsuit accuses Nice of menacing and threatening him with a loaded firearm.

Portland Police Commissioner Dan Saltzman told KATU on Friday he would consider taking Nice off the street. On Monday, he told KATU Reporter Dan Tilkin that he and Portland Police Chief Rosie Sizer consulted, and "we have determined he will be placed in an administrative assignment off the street.”

Nice is off work and on family leave. When Nice returns from leave, he'll be "basically working in an office environment in the bureau," Saltzman said.

Meanwhile, Saltzman wasn't shy about how he feels on this matter: "I am embarrassed by Sgt. Nice in this road-rage incident, and I think it was totally unprofessional and it doesn’t set a good example for other officers. It’s not what the public expects of our officers, on or off duty.”

The case now goes in from the recently set-up citizen review board.

"I think the public deserves better from officers who are on, or off, duty,” Saltzman said.
In addition to the Nice incident, Portland police union president Sgt. Scott Westerman admitted to pulling over a woman twice while off-duty and yelling at her. Virginia Thompson was near Interstate 205 and two days later she and her husband were on the other side of town on Beaverton Hillsdale Highway. Thompson said in both instances Westerman screamed at her because he thought her lights were on high. She said he told her he was a police officer and could have her arrested.

Westerman said he was ashamed of the incident.
Saltzman said he’s going to wait for the Internal Affairs investigation to end before taking action with Westerman, who's not an active patrol officer.

He also said he’ll wait for the investigation to conclude on Sgt. Nice before deciding on further discipline.

Nice was one of the officers involved in the police custody death of James Chasse - a mentally ill man - in September 2006.

From Williamette Week

Mental Health Advocate Takes on Saltzman for City Council

In his second straight day in the news, prominent mental-health advocate Jason Renaud announced today he'll run against City Commissioner Dan Saltzman next year. Renaud, a volunteer for the Mental Health Association of Portland, is a prominent critic of the police role in the in-custody death three years ago of James Chasse Jr. Renaud (pictured above) also weighed in on Saltzman's decision yesterday to reverse himself and reinstate Officer Christopher Humphreys, who used a beanbag gun on a 12-year-old girl who was resisting arrest. (The race for Saltzman's seat also has two other candidates: Ed Garren and Spencer Burton.) More on the political implications of Saltzman's decision on Humphreys in tomorrow's issue of WW.
 
 
by JAMES PITKIN 11.30.2009
Posted In: CLEAN UP, City Hall, Cops and Courts at 03:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (10)
 
 

Sizer and Saltzman Cave; Police Union Suspends No-Confidence Vote

The Portland police union has declined to release the results of last week's no-confidence vote on Police Commissioner Dan Saltzman and Chief Rosie Sizer today as planned. In a news release (PDF), the Portland Police Association says the decision came after Saltzman and Sizer agreed today to give back Officer Chris Humphreys' badge. "The (union's) rally on November 24 was designed to focus on the need for due process for Officer Humphreys; to have the incident thoroughly investigated before any decision was made," the news release says. "Today's actions grant those basic due process rights." Sgt. Scott Westerman (photo above), head of the police union, tells WW by email he will have no further comment beyond the release. Salzman and Sizer issued their own news release (PDF) earlier this afternoon confirming that Humphreys — who was involved in a controversial beanbag shooting Nov. 14 — has been placed "in an off-street administrative assignment." Such an assignment was Sizer's original decision on what to do with Humphreys pending the investigation. Saltzman overruled her then and decided to to pull Humphreys' badge, placing him on administrative leave Nov. 19. Saltzman's office says he will have no further comment today on why he changed his mind.
 
 
by JAMES PITKIN 11.27.2009
Posted In: CLEAN UP, Cops and Courts at 12:09 PM | Permalink | Comments (6)
 
 

Police Union Boss Pushes Back on Two Theories about the No-Confidence Vote

Amid all the political speculation on the Portland Police Associations's current no-confidence vote against Chief Rosie Sizer and Police Commissioner Dan Saltzman, two recurring theories have endured. Both were swatted down today by union president Sgt. Scott Westerman in an interview with WW. The first theory making the rounds has it that the union's no-confidence vote against Sizer and Saltzman for placing Officer Chris Humphreys on administrative leave is, in part, meant to benefit the cops when contract negotiations between the union and the city begin next year. Some observers believe weakening Saltzman could create leverage for the union. Others have noted that pissing off City Hall as a tactic could backfire. And Westerman today swatted down any such speculation about the vote a couple of days before the union is scheduled to announce the results. "People say this is for leverage, but that is not the case," he said. "This is about public safety. This is about our members looking at the chief and the police commissioner and saying, we followed our training, what do you expect us to do now?" Westerman also noted, as some observers believe, that "this will actually hurt our ability for contract negotiations." The second bit of speculation involves City Commissioner Randy Leonard. It's been reported that the union is working closely with Gallatin Public Affairs. Political insiders also know that Leonard has close ties with Gallatin lobbyist Greg Peden. Could it be that Leonard, a former firefighter union boss who has nursed his own designs to become police commissioner, is somehow playing puppet-master at the union through his friend Peden? Westerman scoffs at the notion, saying the union is working not only with Peden but the entire Gallatin team in Portland, with Shannon McCarthy Berg as the union's main contact at the firm. "I can assure you there has been no collusion between the Portland Police Association and any city commissioner to conspire toward anything," Westerman says. "I think Randy's quotes recently exemplify that."
 
 
by JAMES PITKIN 11.19.2009
Posted In: CLEAN UP, Cops and Courts at 04:19 PM | Permalink | Comments (13)
 
 

Chasse Cop Christopher Humphreys Placed on Administrative Leave (UPDATED with union reaction)

Portland Police Commissioner Dan Saltzman has directed that Police Officer Christopher Humphreys be placed on administrative leave while investigators look into Humphreys firing a beanbag round at the thigh of a 12-year-old girl at close range. In this release (PDF), police say Humphreys —who also was involved in the death of James Chasse— and Officer Aaron Dauchy responded to a call at 10:47 pm last Saturday that took them to the MAX platform on 162nd Avenue. Police say officers were told there had been a large party with several gang members that had just broken up, and that a gun had been found in bushes near the party. Humphreys and Dauchy got on the MAX train heading west with about 20-30 teen-agers, including a girl Dauchy knew was excluded from the trains, police say. When Dauchy tried to take her into custody, police say she swung at him and resisted despite repeated warnings from Humphreys that he would fire the beanbag gun. Police Chief Rosie Sizer says a TriMet video of the incident left her "troubled." And Saltzman said he "directed that Officer Humphreys be immediately removed from the street and placed on administrative leave." Sizer read the prepared statement at a news conference and took no questions. Police spokeswoman, Det. Mary Wheat, wouldn't comment on whether there was a policy dictating the proper range for a beanbag shot. UPDATE: After Sizer ended her news conference without taking questions, police union president Scott Westerman held his own news conference on the steps of the Justice Center. Flanked by about 40 other officers, Westerman said Humphreys is a "well-respected" officer and called his actions "appropriate, justified, warranted and necessary" to defuse the situation. Westerman said regulations governing beanbag use require shots to the torso be from at least 10 feet away but that in closer-range situations, beanbag rounds to the extremities are OK. Westerman added that there are no restrictions on using beanbags against children. Westerman ascribed Humphreys' punishment to what he termed a "bias" against Humphreys after the Chasse death. And Westerman said Saltzman's decision to put Humphreys on administrative leave overrode Sizer's decision to only take Humphreys off the street. He said both Sizer and Saltzman have lost the confidence of police rank-and-file.
 
 
by BETH SLOVIC 12.07.2009
Posted In: CLEAN UP, City Hall at 02:27 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
 
 

Saltzman, Fritz And Sizer Meet with Mental Health Advocate

Given all the issues swirling around Portland police, here's a meeting worth noting. City Commissioner Dan Saltzman, who oversees the Portland Police Bureau, Commissioner Amanda Fritz, a former psychiatric nurse, and Police Chief Rosie Sizer are scheduled to meet this afternoon with Richard Harris, according to Fritz's calendar. Harris is the Oregon Department of Human Services' assistant director for addictions and mental health, and was formerly the executive director of Portland's Central City Concern. Detective Mary Wheat, a spokeswoman for the police, says the group is "information sharing."
 
 
by HANK STERN 12.10.2009
Posted In: CLEAN UP, Politics, City Hall at 02:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
 
 

Now Look Who's Mad at Dan Saltzman

Karin Hansen, who's never been shy about weighing in on what's roiling City Hall, is now upset with Commissioner Dan Saltzman in the wake of his reinstatement of Officer Christopher Humphreys to desk duty pending investigation into Humphreys' use of a beanbag gun against a 12-year-old girl who was resisting arrest. Hansen, who's married to former Mayor Tom Potter, responded to a Facebook thread last night by the Rev. Chuck Currie that said he wouldn't support Saltzman for re-election and that he "will be looking for a progressive voice to support." Hansen's reply: "You are oh so right! Thank you for your bold commentary." In case you're wondering whether that signals any interest by Hansen in being added to Saltzman's growing list of challengers in the 2010 election, don't. Hansen (in the photo above with Jasun Wurster, organizer of the first effort to recall Mayor Sam Adams) tells WW she isn't interested in running against Saltzman next year.
 
 
by HANK STERN 12.18.2009
Posted In: CLEAN UP, Politics, City Hall at 03:03 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
 
 

The Newest Challenger To Dan Saltzman is ...

Jesse Cornett. There's been no shortage of candidates filing recently to take on city Commissioner Dan Saltzman next year. And Cornett, who's leaving his post as assistant to PSU's president at the end of this year, has been a political candidate before. One of the founders both of Blue Oregon and the Bus Project, the now-34-year-old Cornett ran unsuccessfully for the state Legislature in 2006. He also considered trying again for a legislative seat this year before deciding against it. Now living in Lents, Cornett says he's filing the paperwork today to take on Saltzman in the City Hall race instead of Commissioner Nick Fish —who's also up for re-election next year— because Saltzman has been in office for three terms with what Cornett says are "few accomplishments." Cornett faults Saltzman for losing control of one of the more recent issues the commissioner had to deal with in Saltzman's reversal of his original decision in the case of Officer Christopher Humphreys. Cornett also wrote an op-ed in The Oregonian that also probably made Cornett no friends in the police union. Cornett says his experience in the city and state, including previous work as a senior policy adviser and legislative aide for former Oregon Secretary of State Bill Bradbury, makes him the best-qualified candidate to take on Saltzman. "I didn't see anyone else in the race being a really strong contender," says Cornett, who plans to seek public financing.
 
 
by BETH SLOVIC 01.11.2010
Posted In: CLEAN UP, City Hall at 12:20 PM | Permalink | Comments (14)
 
 

Updated: A Sixth Candidate Joins Race Against Dan Saltzman

Rudy Soto, student body president at Portland State University from 2007 to 2008, will file next week to run against Commissioner Dan Saltzman, joining five others who have already announced their intention to challenge the three-time incumbent. Soto says he plans to make an official announcement next Monday, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. Soto, 24, has already seen the dark side of political campaigns. Back in 2007 when he ran for PSU student-body president, his victory at the polls was challenged in an underhanded fashion that required intervention from the state Attorney General's office. It's already been said many times that Soto has a biography tailor-made for politics in the Obama age. Of mixed Latino and Native American heritage, Soto at one point lived in an Idaho facility for juvenile delinquents. He then moved to Portland, where he graduated from Cleveland High School before enrolling at PSU. In 2008, Soto took a leave from college to join the Oregon National Guard. Currently on "drilling status" that requires service one weekend a month, Soto plans to graduate from PSU in June. Soto also has seen his share of City Hall politics recently. A member of Mayor Sam Adams' committee studying the Rose Quarter redevelopment, Soto is also an intern in Commissioner Nick Fish's office. Soto says he informed Fish, who is also up for re-election, this morning of his intention to run. "He did ask, 'Wait a second, which position?'" Soto says. Soto adds that his decision was influenced, at least in part, by the event hosted by his fellow challengers on Friday night, which was sparsely attended. "I think I could create more interest in the race," Soto says. Update at 5:30 pm: Soto filed Monday Jan. 11 to run against Saltzman. Photo of Soto with then presidential candidate Barack Obama courtesy of Soto.
 
 
by BETH SLOVIC 01.19.2010
Posted In: CLEAN UP, City Hall at 12:04 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
 
 

Dan Saltzman Files For Fourth Term

The six candidates who have declared their desire to challenge Portland City Commissioner Dan Saltzman finally have a challenger in Saltzman; the three-time incumbent officially filed today to seek a fourth term. His website is DanSaltzman.com.
 
 


Police psychics

Though testimony or evidence based on psychics is unadmissible in court, all a police psychic does is gets a lead for the police department of any city, and a detective solves the crime.  They also work with a police artist to get a desrciption of the person.

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Homeless man harassed by police

At about 8:30 am, on July 23,2011, a Portland police officer was hassling a homeless hippie in front of the Greyhound station.  I do not know what they were saying, but it appears that it is true that the cops in Portland do not care about the poor or homeless at all.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

The police

The police should protect and serve the law abiding citizens.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

USA Secret Police

The USA Has their own gestapo now.  This is an Orwellian nightmare.  Ever read 1984?

The Secret Police and Political Dissent

by John W. Whitehead
2/6/2006

Once upon a time, a handful of colonists, fed up with being arrested and jailed for speaking out, decided to take on the British Empire. These great dissenters won the war. And when it came time to write the Constitution, they made sure that they included the rights to free speech and to protest by enshrining these essential freedoms in the First Amendment.

Unfortunately, many of us have not learned the lessons that our forefathers tried to teach us. Indeed, as we move further into the new millennium, the American government increasingly resembles the empire against which our ancestors fought.

This fact was made abundantly clear with the passage of the USA Patriot Act and more recently with the revelation that President Bush bypassed federal law in approving warrantless electronic surveillance of Americans. And a new bill, sponsored by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), gives the Secret Service unbridled authority to suppress political dissent—one of the most basic and essential elements of democracy.

The proposed law, with the Orwellian title “Secret Service Authorization and Technical Modification Act of 2005,” states: “It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons to willfully and knowingly enter any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.” Without defining what a “special event of national significance” is, the provision continues: “It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons to willfully, knowingly, and with intent…engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any building or grounds designated a special event of national significance.” The phrase “engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct” is not defined, either. This means that whatever constitutes an event of “national significance” or “disruptive conduct” is left entirely to the discretion of the secret police.

And the penalty for breaking this law would increase the maximum imprisonment from 6 months to 10 years if committed with a weapon or 1 year if committed without a weapon.

The proposed law also creates a new federal police force: “There is hereby created and established a permanent police force, to be known as the ‘United States Secret Service Uniformed Division.’” And: “Under the direction of the Director of the Secret Service, members of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division are authorized to…carry firearms; make arrests without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence.”

This law reaches a legitimate and necessary concern. And to the extent that it merely intends to protect the President without trampling on the civil liberties of Americans, the law makes sense. But that is precisely the problem—it provides law enforcement officials broad authority and discretion over our most basic rights. By giving federal agents the ability to prevent a citizen from attending a political event based on the belief—unfounded or not—that they will protest or speak unfavorably about the government, the law violates the right to speak freely on matters of public concern. After all, at the heart of the First Amendment is the ability to criticize the government and have an open and free discussion about its policies. The law also allows these new federal police agents the power to arrest and conduct warrantless searches, arguably in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

All this despite the fact that federal law currently provides criminal penalties for entering a restricted area where the President or other person is protected by the Secret Service.
However, even under current law, the Secret Service has participated in harassment of individuals who have appeared at taxpayer-funded forums with the President if they are perceived to disagree with the Bush Administration’s position. For example, on March 21, 2005, two Denver students who had obtained tickets from their Congressman were expelled from a “town hall” forum because they had an anti-war bumper sticker on their car. Officials, including one who identified himself as a Secret Service agent, told the students the event was limited to audience members who shared the President’s views and that they would have to leave, even if they had no intention of disrupting the event. It apparently made no difference that the topic of the forum was Social Security reform, not the Iraq war. Similar incidents have occurred at presidential visits throughout the country.

The new law could seriously worsen the impact on free speech by banning any form of dissent, peaceful or not. It would allow the Secret Service, in effect, to declare martial law, cordon off areas and enforce exclusion zones at any event deemed a “special event of national significance.” This even if no Secret Service protectee were scheduled to speak or attend.

In fact, it most likely would be used against groups from diverse political backgrounds. For example, if the Secret Service declares the next U.N. conference on population control an “event of national significance,” it could arrest members of anti-abortion groups who want to protest. And under this new law, the Secret Service could shut down areas throughout the conference and arrest any potential protester who might violate the zone.

Sadly, the targets of the Secret Service under this law will not be terrorists or threats to national security. Perhaps that is the problem with post-9/11 America—the cloud of fear is so pervasive that we can no longer make commonsense judgments about own security and safety.

All law enforcement officers—federal, state and local—take an oath to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States [Including Obama]. And while many of them make a commendable effort to fulfill this obligation, others fail to understand the very document they swore to uphold. Countless congressional actions are passed every year seeking to address legitimate and pressing problems. But many of them, like this one, naively assume that they will be enforced by individuals who have a clear understanding of and appreciation for our Bill of Rights.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

FBI and Police got hackers on staff

The FBI and local police employ expert hackers to break into activists' computers to harass them.  Obama obviously condones this action or he is so much of a reagan style retarded imbicle that he does not know what is going on.  Or he is too stoned to care.



Monday, July 28, 2003

Hacker claims he was working for FBI

Feds not talking, but county forging ahead on case
By Dan Horn
The Cincinnati Enquirer


[img]
Jesse Tuttle, a computer hacker better known as 'Hackah Jak.'
(Joseph Fuqua II photo)
| ZOOM |
"Jesse Tuttle was sure he had made a good deal two years ago when he agreed to help the government safeguard sensitive computer systems against hackers, thieves and terrorists.
For Tuttle, a computer hacker known around the world as "Hackah Jak," it was the chance of a lifetime.
The deal would help him avoid prosecution on computer hacking charges and would pay him to do something he loves: search the Internet for vulnerable computer systems. If he found one, he says, he wrote a report about it for the FBI in Cincinnati.
"He is a genius with computers," says Tuttle's lawyer, Firooz Namei. "He was basically the eyes and ears of the FBI on this world that no one knows exists."
But Tuttle's Internet sleuthing ended in May, when Hamilton County sheriff's deputies charged the 23-year-old Camp Dennison man with breaking into the county's computer network and accused him of storing child pornography on his home computer.
Tuttle says his work with federal authorities explains everything, and that he was arrested because one government agency didn't know what another was doing.
But the FBI isn't talking and county officials stand by Tuttle's arrest.
Tuttle's case is the product of an intensifying cyber war between hackers and law enforcement officials around the world. It's a high-tech war with high stakes.
The fight will decide who has access to everything from credit card numbers to military secrets to designs for the next generation of space shuttles.
And as Tuttle's case illustrates, it's not always easy to tell the good guys from the bad.
"You never really know what (a hacker's) motives are and who else they may be working with," says Dorothy Denning, a professor at the Naval Postgraduate School who has written about cyber terrorism. "There is some risk involved."
But with the number of computer intrusions nationwide jumping from 22,000 to 82,000 in the past three years, authorities and private companies are increasingly willing to work with hackers like Tuttle in hopes of preventing online attacks.
The trend has sometimes caused disagreements and confusion among law enforcement agencies, as Tuttle claims happened in his case. And it has forced hackers who traditionally guard their independence to choose sides.
Hackers dedicated to making the Internet more secure call themselves "white hats," while those determined to damage or steal from Web sites consider themselves "black hats."
Tuttle refers to himself as a "gray hat," someone who does no serious harm but still enjoys the illicit thrill of cracking a system.
"It's always been like a sport for me," says Tuttle, who is free pending his trial. "Being able to do it, outsmarting the system. ... I find a lot of pleasure in it."
Whatever Tuttle's motives - and whether he was really working for or against the government, or both - his story is a cautionary tale from the front lines of a war most Americans never see.
Contact with the FBI
Tuttle says his motives have been clear since the day he agreed to help the government. He says everything he did - from tapping into computer systems to posing as a teenage girl online - was related to his work with the FBI.
He says he helped make several highly sensitive government networks more secure and, in one case, helped federal agents track a pedophile's online activities.
"I never tried to steal goods or services," Tuttle says. "If I found out about (a vulnerable system), I'd hack the system. If there was a problem ... I'd call the FBI and say there is a hole."
That's what he says he was doing earlier this year when he tapped into the county's Regional Computer Center, which stores electronic versions of court records, property tax information and other data.
Although Tuttle says the FBI never asked him to crack specific systems - including the county's system - he says the agency encouraged his work and paid him up to $1,000 cash at a time for information.
As a matter of policy, FBI officials neither confirm nor deny working with specific informants. But court records and other sources show a link between Tuttle and federal authorities.
Tuttle signed an agreement with federal prosecutors in August 2001 that helped him avoid criminal charges for hacking into the computer system of a New York brokerage firm. Although it was not a formal cooperation agreement, the document states that Tuttle "agreed to provide the government with information."
Tuttle and his lawyer at the time, C. Ransom Hudson, say it was understood that Tuttle would continue to help the FBI. Tuttle has business cards from agents in New York and Cincinnati and says he remained in regular contact.
"They decided to see how he could be useful," Hudson says of the FBI.
He says federal authorities delivered a new CD burner for Tuttle to his law office so the young computer hacker could take it home, copy information that he gathered on the Internet and share it with the FBI.
The CD burner, along with the rest of Tuttle's computer equipment, is now in the hands of sheriff's investigators.
Prosecutor Mike Allen says the man known as Hackah Jak is a criminal, regardless of whatever else he may have been doing. He says he has not yet contacted the FBI about the case.
"We don't know anything about it," Allen says. "We're just concerned about our case."
Namei says the FBI's efforts in the worldwide cyber war will suffer as long as local authorities prosecute his client.
"These charges could be destructive to a relationship that the FBI has nurtured," says Namei, who says he has spoken several times to FBI agents about their work with Tuttle. "
Tuttle says he just wants his name cleared.
He says he knows nothing about child pornography on his computer but speculates it may stem from his work on the pedophile case. And he says his brief invasion of the county's system was typical of his work with the FBI.
Typically, Tuttle learned about potentially vulnerable systems from talking to other hackers online. The only wrinkle this time was that he says he investigated the county's system after a freelance writer asked him whether he thought it might be vulnerable. "I gained access in two seconds," Tuttle says of the county's system.
He says he was preparing a report about it for the FBI at the time of his arrest.
An online celebrity
Even before his arrest, Tuttle had numerous brushes with controversy. Though most know him as a bartender who lives with his parents in Camp Dennison, his alter ego, Hackah Jak, has been an online celebrity for years.
His hacker resume includes raids on Web sites for Sony Corp., Comedy Central and even the Girl Scouts. In each case, he says, he left a calling card but rarely did significant damage.
After cracking a food Web site, for example, he added a series of recipes for meals "you can eat while hacking."
Like many hackers, some of whom have dubbed themselves "hacktivists," Tuttle says there is good in what he does. Hackers can make political statements, he says, and their raids often lead to improvements in computer security.
While that may be true, some experts say, it also may be nothing more than an excuse for bad behavior.
"I think there's a lot of people who say they are hacktivists when in reality they are just interested in sophomoric attempts to get notoriety," says Dan Moniz, a staff technologist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit group dedicated to protecting people's freedoms online.
But Tuttle says he's more interested in hacktivism than showing off.
He points out that Hackah Jak was among the most vocal of the hackers who raided Chinese government Web sites after China seized an American spy plane more than two years ago.
He said he did much the same after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks when he helped create "The Dispatchers," a group of hackers that targeted government sites in several Middle Eastern countries.
Tuttle says the same sense of patriotism that drove him then was one of the reasons his deal with the FBI was so appealing.
He acknowledges he had another motive, too: The opportunity to avoid criminal charges for hacking the New York brokerage firm.
A risky business
It is that mix of motives that makes any deal with hackers a risky proposition. Hackers, by their very nature, walk a fine line between harmless fun and serious legal trouble.
But as computer crime continues to rise, hackers have found their skills are marketable.
"We won't hire them, but some will," says Peggy Weigle, chief executive officer of Sanctum Inc., a security consulting firm in Santa Clara, Calif. "There is a kind of religious debate about it. Some feel once they do that sort of thing, they've gone too far."
There are risks for hackers, too. While most security work is done with full disclosure to the parties involved, hackers like Tuttle work in a less defined, more dangerous world.
That's because the act of cracking a system is usually a crime, even if the hacker does no harm and later tells the Web site manager how to fix the security breach.
"How that's received depends on who is on the other end," Moniz says. "Some will say 'thanks,' and some will file a lawsuit or criminal charges."
Hamilton County officials have taken the latter approach with Tuttle.
"He didn't do anything malicious. He just got in there," says Ed DePompei, a project manager at the Regional Computer Center. "But if you leave your door open and somebody walks in and sits down in your chair, would you consider that a crime? Just because the door is open, it doesn't mean I'm inviting you in."
Tuttle says he doesn't understand how an act he considers a good deed could be turned into criminal charges and a possible 80 years in prison.
But despite his predicament, he says he is eager to get back online and back into the cyber war.
"The work I do for the FBI," Tuttle says, 'I can still do that work for them.' "

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Protest over Portland Police Shootings

Protest over Portland Police shootings

Around 30 people marched from the Hollywood transit centre to the Southeast Portland police precinct in order to demonstrate against the recent continued police involved shootings and deaths. Portland, Oregon, 03/01/2010
The march began just before 9pm, heading to Sandy Blvd. then heading east and south on NE 47th street until it arrived at the precinct.

A number of police cars eventually showed up as the protesters crossed the Banfield expressway on 47th. The police were met with numerous bins blocking their path behind the protest that had been tipped over and sprawled across the road.

One Wells Fargo on Sandy Blvd. was spray painted with an 'Anarchy' symbol whilst another person smashed a window with a brick.

As the protesters approached the Southeast Precinct on Burnside, numerous police in riot gear began to block off the entrances with their cars and heavily armed officers.

The protest, organised last minute, was in response to the recent surge in officer involved shootings.

On Saturday January 1st an officer fired a shot outside a Portland nightclub. His aim, which missed, was at a suspect who killed the bouncer for Club 915, Ruben Mata.

On Monday December 27th police fired a taser, beanbag shotgun and an AR-15 rifle at Southwest Portland man Marcus Lagozzino who was wielding a machete. The suspect remains hospitalised in critical condition.

On Friday December 17th, officers shot at least 16 rounds, killing Darryl Ferguson in the hallway outside his apartment in Southeast, after he reportedly threatened neighbors with a gun that turned out to be a fake weapon.

Mayor of Portland, Sam Adams, who also plays the police commissioner role has said in response to the officer involved shootings that the bureau would remain "dedicated to continued improvement" in maintaing law and order in as "peaceful a way as possible."

Last year saw many deaths from officer involved shootings, concerning but not limited to mentally unstable and homeless people.

On January 29th an unarmed black male, Aaron Campbell was shot in the back with an AR-15 by officer Ronald Frashour whilst he was surrendering to the police. Reportedly officers had removed their ear pieces, shooting first with bean bag rounds then releasing a K-9 attack dog before the fatal shooting.

Jack Collins, a distraught homeless man with self inflicted wounds was shot dead in Hoyt Arboretum on March 22nd after he failed to drop a razor blade he was holding. Four shots were fired with the fatal blow striking an artery in his Pelvis.

James P. Chasse Jr., a 42-year-old man with schizophrenia was knocked to the ground after running from officers who suspected he was urinating in a street. He later died in police custody from blunt force trauma to the chest on September 17th 2006.

Another case of officers not being able to control a situation effectively happened in November when a 12 year old girl was shot with a beanbag on a MAX tram platform after she punched an officer in the mouth whilst they struggled to take her into custody.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

American: land of police state persecution

America: Land of Police State Persecution

What do you call a country that glorifies wars and violence in the name of peace... One that believes pacifism is sissy and unpatriotic. One that feels militarism is a higher form of civilization. One that threatens planetary life... One with the world's largest prison population, a domestic gulag besides others abroad.
America: Land of Police State Persecution - by Stephen Lendman

An earlier article discussed America's violent culture, accessed through the following link:

 http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2007/09/culture-of-violence.html

Its opening comments are expanded below:

What do you call a country that glorifies wars and violence in the name of peace. One that's been at war every year in its history against one or more adversaries. One that believes pacifism is sissy and unpatriotic. One that feels militarism is a higher form of civilization. One that threatens planetary life.

One corrupted by malfeasance. One with the world's largest prison population, a domestic gulag besides others abroad. One placing no value on human rights and life. One exploiting the many for the few. One empowering money over people, championing concentrated wealth. One calling fake elections real.

One practicing torture as official policy. One dripping with racism and hatemongering. One with the highest homicide rate of all western nations and a passion for guns. One where violent films, sports, and video games are most popular. One where authorities participate in illicit drugs trafficking, letting major banks launder revenues.

One where state-sponsored terrorism subverts democratic freedoms, targeting the weak and disadvantaged relentlessly. One recklessly out of control, harsh and inhumane on a fast track toward despotism. One where the rule of law is rhetoric, not policy, where dominance supersedes rights, where dissent is now criminal.

One also where authorities persecute residents for their race, faith, ethnicity, or immigration status. One where thousands targeted are arrested, charged, convicted, wrongfully imprisoned, and at times deported after weeks, months or even years of harsh incarceration.

At age 16, Tashnuba Hayder was victimized, deported in May 2005 to Bangladesh after weeks in federal detention.

Reporting on June 17, 2005 from Dhaka, New York Times writer Nina Bernstein headlined, "Questions, Bitterness and Exile for Queens Girl in Terror Case," saying:

America was her home since kindergarten. Now in an unfamiliar country, unconversant with its language and customs, she was "forced to leave the United States (after) the FBI (falsely) identified her as a potential suicide bomber." Stunned, she said:

"I feel like I'm on a different planet. It just hit me. How everything happened - it's like, 'Oh, my God.' "

In recent memory, she was the first minor investigated for terror, "stoking the debate over the right balance between government vigilance and the protection of individual freedoms."

The daughter of Muslim immigrants, her case was shrouded in secrecy, and remained so under the FBI's requested court-ordered seal. It barred participants from disclosing information authorities want to keep secret. Bernstein said they "declined repeated requests to present (their) side."

Deported on immigration, not terrorism, charges, they remained tight lipped on her case. It wasn't entirely clear why she was targeted. She denies federal accusations, saying FBI agents apparently learned she'd visited an Internet chat room where speeches of Sheik Omar Bakri Muhummed, a London-based Muslim cleric, were posted.

In the mid-1980s, Bakri and Anjem Choudary founded Al-Muhajiroun, London Guardian writer Alan Travis (on January 11, 2010) headlining, "Extremist Islamist groups to be banned under new terror laws," saying:

"Membership (in) either al-Muhajiroun or Islam4UK would become punishable by a 10-year prison term," claiming both organizations support terrorism. Post-9/11, "The group became notorious for praising the" attacks. In 2005, Bakri was banned from Britain on grounds that his presence was "not conducive to the public good," not for any crime or intent to commit one.

In a May 25, 2005 interview, Bakri said media accounts distorted his views. For example, claiming he preaches jihad against Jews is false and outrageous. In 1990, however, he spoke out against American forces in the Gulf and Saudi Arabia. On the 9/11 attacks, he called them no surprise, a terrorist act "no different from what the US forces have been doing in Iraq, Sudan and Afghanistan both before and after 9/11."

The solution he proposed was "hands of Muslim lands!" Otherwise, millions will resist aggression and occupation. He concluded saying, "If the US continues with her policy against Islam and the Muslim world, Muslims will be more inclined to strike blows against America" in return. It's hard to disagree, and furthermore, international law sanctifies the right to self-defense.

Tashnuba's Persecution

In March 2005, FBI agents, posing as youth counselors, confronted her at home, "questioning everything from her views on jihad to her posterless walls...." They also examined her diary, phone book, and school papers. One included a diagram for a school assignment on religion with the word "suicide" highlighted. It was held as evidence of her alleged interest in becoming a bomber.

Tashnuba said her chat room exchanges were on other topics, including about a utopian state under Islamic law. Islam, of course, promotes peace, not violence, what too few in the West understand and media sources won't explain, instead portraying it as dangerously radical and fundamentalist, the term jihad falsely used.

Variously translated, it means struggle, effort, to strive, to exert, or to fight but not a call to arms or "holy war" as western reports suggest. It can also mean a spiritual struggle for self-improvement or moral cleaning. In that sense, it's every Muslim's duty, including to improve society, oneself, and to prevent poor and disadvantaged people from being exploited.

After being seized, Tashnuba and Adama Bah, a Muslim native of Guinea, were held at a rural Pennsylvania maximum security juvenile facility. For two weeks, she was strip-searched and aggressively interrogated without counsel or her parents present. They weren't told where she was or why authorities took her away, saying she'd probably be back the next day.

After two weeks, The Times got a government document saying both girls posed "an imminent threat to the security of the United States based on evidence that they plan to be suicide bombers." However, the document cited no evidence. Clearly there was none, nor is there in virtually all other terrorism-related cases.

Under a gag order, Adama was later released. Tashnuba was told she'd be freed only by agreeing to immediate deportation to Bangladesh, a country she left at age four, didn't speak the language or know relatives with whom she had to live, leaving her parents and siblings behind.

She explained that she opposes suicide bombings and violence, saying her interest in Bakri was only casual. Yet authorities treated her like a criminal, simply for exercising her First Amendment right.

Interrogated by aggressive agents, including Foria Younis, a secular Muslim woman of Pakistani descent, described by London Daily Telegraph as a "gun-toting, door-kicking member of the FBI's counter-terrorist squad," she held her own, saying:

"They tried to twist my mind. They had their little tactics - start with nice questions, try to get more severe. In the end, when I did cry they were, like, mocking me. The FBI tried to say I didn't have a life - like, I wasn't the typical teenager. They thought I was anti-American because I didn't want to compromise, but in my high school ethics class we had communists, Democrats, Republicans, Gothics - all types. In all our classes, we were told, 'You speak up, you give your opinion, and you defend it.' "

A government psychiatrist recommended her release, saying she was neither suicidal or homicidal. Tashnuba, however, explained that agents kept "trying to link me to the psychological state," citing a single artificial rose in her bedroom, a required psychology course, and an assigned essay on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Her tutor, Asmaa Samad, called it innocuous, saying "It (included) nothing derogative, nothing unpatriotic."

Tashnuba feels interrogators used one sentence against her, stating "I feel like Muslims are being targeted, they're being outcasted more." It's true, of course, many hundreds more like her unfairly treated and abused for their faith, race, and ethnicity.

Without evidence of wrongdoing, it's invented, authorities persecuting innocent targets. In Tashnuba's case, they also focused on her immigration status. Her parents' asylum application went unprocessed for a decade, so they used it as grounds for holding, then deporting her, choosing that course over criminal prosecution.

Perhaps her juvenile status was why. Also, however, as news spread about her, the New York Bangladeshi general consul pressed authorities for an explanation. The reply gotten cited her "unlawful presence," not terrorism related issues.

Moreover, a "voluntary departure" court order indicated no national security issue. Tashnuba believes her noncitizen status made her vulnerable, giving authorities another option over bogus terrorism charges, though prosecutorial aggressiveness in other cases shows they'll use any means to convict, even without evidence. For sure, they flaunt the rule of law, due process, and judicial fairness.

A Final Comment

On May 12, 2005, Tashnuba arrived in Dhaka, another world compared to America. It could have been worse if authorities pressed terrorism charges like against hundreds of other Muslims given long prison terms, sometimes for life. Because of her ordeal, she wished she'd never come to America, saying "I see now you have no privacy, no liberty."

Indeed so, and for others besides Muslims. Anyone challenging US policies risks recrimination at a time civil liberties are fast eroding. The rule of law is a nonstarter, and as George Bush crudely put it, "The Constitution is just a goddam piece of paper." The way both major parties govern, he was right, ordinary people losing out, especially Muslims in America at the wrong time.

Even in Dhaka, Tashnuba's not safe, two late October emails saying she was arrested recently and released, again being victimized. For several years, she taught English full-time, though not at present. However, she hopes to resume doing it soon.

Sadly, injustice may have followed her to Bangladesh, an impoverished country with a shoddy human rights record, notorious for exploiting workers.

Last August, Amnesty International (AI) issued an action alert, saying labor rights activists risked torture, ill-treatment, or death following street protests for worker rights. In June, AI said security forces used excessive force raiding Mirza Abbas' home, a former Dkaha mayor and Bangladesh National Party (BNP) figure.

The BNP and ruling Awami League vie for power, each harsh on the other when in charge, letting security forces raid opposition rallies, beat demonstrators, arrest members, prosecute and imprison them unfairly, using torture and other forms of abuse freely, as well as against anyone challenging government authority for their rights.

Tashnuba and 160 million other Bangladeshis endure this, unsafe like in America and elsewhere. Few safe havens exist anywhere for them, especially where US Pentagon forces show up. Iraqis, Afghans, and many others bear testimony to their harshness, giving them no place to hide.

In a November 2 email, Tashnuba said she's "able to cope," but her sister (age 16) and brother (age 5) are finding it hard to adjust. "They are American citizens and do not want to be here." Her mother went back to New York three years ago with her siblings, but was sent back in July on immigration issues. At the time, her brother and sister also had to return.

"As for my father and other brother (age 20), they are still in New York. Dad was taken by immigration (authorities) in March along with my mom and brother." In January 2011, an immigration court will decide whether or not to issue them a green card. She calls the situation "a bit haywire. The unfortunate thing is my parents still want to be living in the states, and I would say (remain) in a state of denial of having to leave" if it comes to that.

Besides her own ordeal, her family's status remains uncertain, made no easier by separation or what lies ahead. One thing, however is clear. America is no safe haven. Anyone for any reason may be persecuted, and in Tashnuba's case deported to a country she called "a different planet." That fate or worse awaits others targeted for political advantage. Why else would America have the world's largest prison system, a gulag by any standard, yet how many people know it.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at  lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

By Stephen Lendman  lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net sjlendman.blogspot.com

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Portland Police cover up

NEWLY - RELEASED DOCUMENTS REVEAL POLICE LIES AND COVER-UP IN THE DEATH OF JAMES CHASSE

PRESS RELEASE:
Attorneys for the family of James Chasse will share these revelations on Monday, October 18, at 1:30 P.M. Evidence includes documents. Until now kept from the public under a "protective order". That disclose a deliberate web of false statements by Portland police officers, planting of false evidence to support their false statements, and a general pattern of cover-up to conceal vital incriminating evidence against the officers.
NEWLY-RELEASED DOCUMENTS REVEAL POLICE LIES AND COVER-UP IN THE DEATH OF JAMES P. CHASSE, JR.

The Portland Police Bureau demonstrated a consistent pattern of lies, deception and cover-up in the death of James P. Chasse, Jr., according to evidence contained in previously-withheld documents that the City of Portland has now released as ordered by the Court.

Attorneys for the family of James Chasse will share these revelations on Monday, October 18, at 1:30 P.M.

Evidence includes documents.
Until now kept from the public under a "protective order".
That disclose a deliberate web of false statements by Portland police officers, planting of false evidence to support their false statements, and a general pattern of cover-up to conceal vital incriminating evidence against the officers.

WHO: Attorneys for the family of James Chasse
WHAT: Media event, open to the public, to share new revelations about police cover-up in the case of James Chasse
WHERE: Ace Hotel, 1022 SW Stark Street, Room: "The Cleaners" (10th Avenue entrance)
WHEN: Monday, October 18, at 1:30 P.M.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Police scandal San Antonio TX

Police Chief William McManus will decide the fate of more than a dozen San Antonio police officers, including some in leadership positions, who were accused of impropriety during two promotional exams, a department spokesman confirmed Friday. Because internal affairs investigations are not public and no one has been disciplined, none of the individuals under investigation are being named.
Sgt. Chris Benavides confirmed that an assistant chief, a captain and a lieutenant were among those being investigated. He said the chief's action advisory board has reviewed the results of the internal affairs investigation and that its recommendations are awaiting McManus' review.
Benavides confirmed that the investigation of the lieutenant, captain and assistant chief involved allegations of impropriety by the lieutenant during a captain's exam, but he could not give details why the higher-ranking officials were also part of the investigation.
Department sources, whose names are being withheld because they aren't authorized to speak publicly, said the assistant chief and captain were accused of not thoroughly investigating the impropriety.
Exactly what the allegations of impropriety are hasn't been revealed.
Those allegations come on the heels of a cheating scandal that erupted when 400 officers took a detective's exam March 8. The results of that investigation also haven't been revealed. At the time, sources said problems began during the grading process when a scanning machine broke down and officers waiting in line allegedly discussed test results.
The action advisory board has also heard those cases, Benavides said, and they, too, are ready for the chief's review.
McManus could begin looking at those cases next week, Benavides said.
Still, any final disciplinary actions could take weeks because when McManus makes a decision and notifies the officer, that officer has a right to meet and appeal directly to the chief.